Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E89771094D for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 22:35:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18133 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2013 22:35:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 18050 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2013 22:35:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 18042 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2013 22:35:21 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 22:35:21 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-pb0-f53.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username robweir, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 22:35:21 +0000 Received: by mail-pb0-f53.google.com with SMTP id un4so6342277pbc.12 for ; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 15:35:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=JxTRReW95CHXxiJIsD6ZeKqRmrdZGTknCD+C11DQkX0=; b=jUxoyV2aMklNBHBCnK/j+PKSKyFzQwMwy4kyYFHrEgZnZ0kgXRqkTrBFYandL7J4vY m5BszG+nwuPDdsHJv6T4Sio28TDiTWjzLCRw0A5KvKXCy4CVkuavJOd1qFUIOSX0rKo0 KI0+rMspCZZMMWnTqjWSgBQWoO5O4ohF11e9pJoS+w+T8BTtgO8vTq1VjsAzWRk6Z5iN McUTOA3KYjyWWKw8Bvro1eMnAnvyPIc7nJYhSZQol/ukDJQFwxPxvtJg2lkkYAN/h5SH DZ60z69jzfemDTRisA5E2dJROmMB7hiScVsXtexnALYxrLmkCS2ki0mERcOkN9+4THAc EGuQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.254.131 with SMTP id ai3mr26070457pad.54.1370298920981; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 15:35:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.27.132 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 15:35:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 18:35:20 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: [VOTE][DISCUSS] Logo selection for Apache OpenOffice 4.0 From: Rob Weir To: "dev@openoffice.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Staring a [VOTE][DISCUSS] thread parallel to the [VOTE] thread. On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: . . . > > My comments with some very preliminary testing: the VERY LIGHT gray > "Apache" in any form doesn't scale well going smaller. The very thin > letters also don't scale well going smaller. > How did you scale the image? By resizing the PNG file? If so that probably doesn't give the optimal quality. If we resize from the SVG source, and if the SVG references a vector font with "hinting", then it is possible that the text will be clearer at smaller sizes. In theory that should help with the letter scaling. Not sure about the light gray. -Rob --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org