Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E6B3CEE0 for ; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 17:41:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14155 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2013 17:41:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 13827 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2013 17:41:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 13813 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2013 17:41:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 17:41:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rajaths.rajaths@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.174] (HELO mail-ob0-f174.google.com) (209.85.214.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 17:41:00 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f174.google.com with SMTP id wd20so9559235obb.5 for ; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 10:40:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=4BBRIpPliGU8rEu0iiOIVLBvcgNF3vUA9nakxJgBE9w=; b=hkiBzM/NYnVZx6pv0+aP5nlbrvgTFYqpBKMqElRnses73VX9Gyp7af/piNldFETamC kfUTFQIprYDakDKgDP17zw2ksmS+AKu4KcnJutnMmPd5Jt6Xa/Tfrt4apKSGzcfQzsSy NgASxQIv4o3EpUCw9D0YpESlKaSxIX3m+u22hCPPnyv1fd5yqgA/+a4A8fmJEHFJx6Nm stEUPxfXZYBFNhprIL20QGqG2iLFLTqMRYLBPo3DowjzRUsiD49w9qoEa3+qamp1bXk5 7/+7gkr6FRMpuJ5+msLp4a/eGa+USab//Kgb9zLMay4ICmYnPaDnPbVprhaWiy3IWnbM jpHQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.125.1 with SMTP id mm1mr5585051obb.47.1371922839623; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 10:40:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.113.228 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 10:40:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 23:10:39 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: PropertyChangeListeners From: Rajath Shashidhara To: dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0122ac5083dccc04dfc1adae X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e0122ac5083dccc04dfc1adae Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello, I have now completed the implementation of "insert" command. I was thinking about the propertychangelisteners. Is it good to store all the properties locally and each time getPropertyValues is called update all the properties and return only the requested properties. This way propertyvhangelistenters can be notified at each getPropertyValues call. Also, Unsure about the "update" ucb command? How does it work in terms of ucb. Because the xcontent example is related to a mailbox. In this case, we dont keep a local copy to update it. (Not seen this in any existing ucp). -- Rajath S, M.Sc(Hons.) Physics, Birla Institute of Technology and Science - Pilani, Pilani --089e0122ac5083dccc04dfc1adae--