Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 99BAAEE23 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 03:37:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45055 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2013 03:37:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 44659 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2013 03:37:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 44649 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2013 03:37:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 03:37:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ivan.pootdiaz@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.171] (HELO mail-ie0-f171.google.com) (209.85.223.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 03:36:55 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f171.google.com with SMTP id qd12so27001754ieb.30 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:36:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=HTT3jGunGSGaLioPDTp6iPyW105/SX2QxP3V+Hja1QI=; b=LuypfmdMoHImVqxvd6xi176kEphOYDlJnKSfpZivBBd0mzX6PFey8KVg4HoY54Yi0w YaT7l/sMEGCGtMfCheBzWlESf5zb6dMwX9zc1h2Y0PBuA5zQracotT8dqq98FqHczR9/ jXL9o5z+gWWuhph0tfwetm8sw9dQLo91cgmV4LABvrXxHjWcaZfZndjJLB+JWyV5XP59 vigVkaa9Oh+ZbDiaHQ3oIIp/7jHl+K2vBJXRf7E42O45XeXTTYIRBoXpOQsty7bvMe3H zRy5Mf4fWNd0zGRfw26OrK28tq1meVkNVavhljmkZEvzkOIOmqnnGe2PmSyLlNTQkDPW hZ3A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.43.171.10 with SMTP id ns10mr9310868icc.77.1372131394799; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:36:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.107.69 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:36:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51C7FF3A.6060607@me.com> References: <51C6E09B.7070102@apache.org> <51C7FF3A.6060607@me.com> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:36:34 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Module cui - Add new color From: Ivan Poot Diaz To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2e1125f509c04dff23ce1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c2e1125f509c04dff23ce1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Ok. Here is the link of the patch https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122582 Best Regards. 2013/6/24 Armin Le Grand > Hi, > > > On 24.06.2013 06:27, Juergen Schmidt wrote: > >> Am Sonntag, 23. Juni 2013 um 13:48 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: >> >>> On 19/06/2013 Ivan Poot Diaz wrote: >>> >>>> This patch "registrodom.patch": >>>> This code snippet allows Auto Registration the colors to Apache >>>> OpenOffice Drawing , ie the self-colored. Through this patch allows the >>>> user to add new colors in the color palette without entering a name. ... >>>> This code I've been working in the module cui (file: tpcolor.cxx). I >>>> would like that the community to help implement this code in AOO. >>>> >>>> >>> Hi Ivan, we didn't receive your patch: the dev mailing list strips all >>> attachments from messages. The right way to send a patch is to create an >>> issue at https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ and attach the patch to it >>> (don't worry about the many other fields, we can always fix them later; >>> but please put a description like the one you put in your e-mail and >>> attach the patch file). >>> >>> >>> be careful with patches that have influence on the UI. We should not >> integrate such patches now at this time on front of the release. >> Adding a single color make no sense and a consistent color scheme is >> important. The focus should be here more on adding a custom color palette >> as an extension. >> > > I guess from the description that it's more about avoiding to ask the user > for a unique name for the new color when entering one in the fill dialog. > Second guess is that such a unique name gets constructed, e.g. using the > RGB values as hex or something similar (white would be named 0xffffff). I > thought about something similar already... > > If it arrives, I can have a look! > > Sincerely, > Armin > > >> Juergen >> >>> Regards, >>> Andrea. >>> >>> ------------------------------**------------------------------** >>> --------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- > ALG > > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org > > --001a11c2e1125f509c04dff23ce1--