openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jörg Schmidt <joe...@j-m-schmidt.de>
Subject Re: Can somebody please commit the update of the de-websites
Date Sun, 23 Jun 2013 11:54:02 GMT
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robweir@apache.org] 


> It is not clear to me if you do not understand what was said, or
> whether you disagree with what was said.  Or maybe a combination of
> both?

My question is whether the outcome of the vote (Dave wrote: "Do we all agree?"), now need
only wait.
Or was the question of Dave, not at all meant as a vote?

> 1) Treat PrOOoBox as a 3rd party distribution and include it in a page
> where we describe other 3rd party distributions.

Yes, that's the way I want to go.

> 2) (more work) make PrOOoBox be an official product of the project.
> If we do that then we can announce it via all the resources we have.

That would be good, but that will require a lot of coordination work.

At the moment, perhaps even following questions:

What content should be on the PrOOo box? e.g. also FireFox?

If the PrOOo box would directly associated with AOO, eg on http://www.openoffice.org/de/prooo-box/,
it would then also the site www.prooo-box.org give (with exactly the same content), and how
would their status? Would then www.prooo-box.org no 3rd party?

> Once you make a proposal, then wait 72-hours (lazy consensus) and if
> there are no objections, then go ahead and do it.

OK.

> We don't need to vote. The important thing is that we all understand
> the constraints about how we relate to 3rd parties and that we make
> this clear on our website.

Yes.


Greetings,
Jörg


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Mime
View raw message