Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 743EAE8C6 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 21:34:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29042 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2013 21:34:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 28960 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2013 21:34:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 28952 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jan 2013 21:34:41 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 21:34:41 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-ob0-f173.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username robweir, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 21:34:40 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f173.google.com with SMTP id xn12so1845509obc.4 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:34:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.22.68 with SMTP id b4mr2145715oef.111.1358372079510; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:34:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.225.66 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:34:39 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 16:34:39 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: New QA Volunteers From: Rob Weir To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 We've got a bunch of new volunteers on the QA list. They've gone through the orientation pages on the website and I've encouraged them to take a batch of defect reports (appropriate to their testing platform) and review them. I'm hoping we can clear out some of the backlog of unconfirmed reports that accumulated, much of it before the Apache project started. It is natural to expect that mistakes will be made, in classifying defects, indicating the resolution, distinguishing what is and isn't a bug versus an enhancement, etc. Everyone new tends to make these errors at first. And since we have a lot of new volunteers we'll certainly see a few of these kinds of errors. So I ask for your patience as they come up to speed. Any gentle correction and encouragement you can offer them when you see an error is also greatly appreciated. Regards, -Rob