Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0409BE638 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:20:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85544 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jan 2013 12:20:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 85003 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jan 2013 12:20:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 84958 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jan 2013 12:20:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:20:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of xuacusk8@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.170] (HELO mail-qc0-f170.google.com) (209.85.216.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:19:56 +0000 Received: by mail-qc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id d42so2394003qca.1 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 04:19:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=srnEKpW1RU6UxiMy1eN9PAyOf9B6PfRDmA2F3g+aoew=; b=XtA2FpIdKZuhqppaoKxzdaw0t/Yo71XqCdOg1xHUF4pZlwN4/dmCPH/vAR1g1YBNKc Tnm2YzROtHdV8FVnmCFXNEdY0hnSZ9tAh54JzwG86Pfs46bTPyuVumcw1UT9SIwUJifn F69M4keHvnAMA2kTu+O5bgMYixAV3MAaMyXLhuR77UyeRoCdZDo5OzAvprmcLBAsi7JS L0bssCKjhge9RmoSGUmKG2oxEw3lmab+IFJwDZ7/5Pcozcfen1IJ18apNJyfo1Jf85kw fs8JoHrar0rA3/bPM8MH0PZm+feKnof79K+nB8Qraznbfb7lsPFjLXslo+Z/Rrv2Lqqb 3IOA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.229.171.40 with SMTP id f40mr4540296qcz.57.1358770775684; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 04:19:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.120.39 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 04:19:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50FCCAC3.9020606@apache.org> References: <50FCCAC3.9020606@apache.org> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:19:35 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Pax not Pox From: Xuacu To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi! As a person working in both sides (and feeling part of both communities), I couldn't agree more. Our approach is to tell our users =C2=ABHey, we are translating a lot of free software. Try it and see what fits your needs better... It's free!=C2=BB All the best -- Xuacu 2013/1/21 Louis Su=C3=A1rez-Potts : > I dislike using antagonistic rhetoric and tactics to give form to > community identity. I confess I did this myself, early in OOo's career, > but I never engaged in FUD--there was no need, the truth was good (or > bad) enough--though I was no doubt frequently wrong. > > The current efforts by published journalists, intentional or not, to > cast aspersions on Apache OpenOffice, to discredit it, and to cheapen > the community's efforts, need to be addressed--but not with antagonism > and not with anger. Errors, accidental or intentional, in Wikipedia, for > instance, but also among journalists reporting on the successors to > OpenOffice.org, must be corrected impartially and accurately. The people > who benefit most from our work are the users who can rely upon a fair > community which they can join and contribute to and do so with the > satisfaction that their contributions are valued in the best possible > way: by making the product not only better but more likely to remain a > commons. > > best > louis > -- > Louis Su=C3=A1rez-Potts > Apache OpenOffice PMC > In Real Life: Community Strategist, Age of Peers > @luispo