Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-31862-apmail-openoffice-dev-archive=openoffice.apache.org@openoffice.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9276FED0D
	for <apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:29:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 53789 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2013 18:29:36 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org
Received: (qmail 53714 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2013 18:29:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@openoffice.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@openoffice.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.openoffice.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org
Received: (qmail 53682 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jan 2013 18:29:36 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:29:36 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bimargulies@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.172 as permitted sender)
Received: from [74.125.82.172] (HELO mail-we0-f172.google.com) (74.125.82.172)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:29:29 +0000
Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id r3so420454wey.3
        for <dev@openoffice.apache.org>; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:29:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=qivHuM2jQlNrGKxoiKqcWeKfFEH9fp+Js5A48oAWcRs=;
        b=0f6AdQ2M9B6eg342wt4bYOVizIY+r9uC9zRrxg+3KZ60VQ7WNRv6yDK93E+7gMCnYx
         jDUStEa6BL2b50fHbyvPYgajLDibv4nnZANOBg1P2UaoHPaNC40NT3euHNWP9mdq5RFE
         5bVGGKlPTE7HTX67If9jPIziLVkZkmIOY21iTkFznRyzXtYdouz0JC99Z317clix2kbH
         hXBExeOXe//9p/vHiuvQo6hPQ8xh2aK9NrebD3hv87wKE3KBixkJpZ3jIpZHQ8pQvLTq
         u7754r2tiPsr05iaeGH71o9SrQ7DjEYAByRLbZ5mckGlHATtOO9nfGBXIFBNFQS1WQV0
         ZbiA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.84.131 with SMTP id z3mr17529205wiy.25.1358447348528;
 Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:29:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.227.20.4 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:29:08 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:29:08 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CALhtWkdPnafahjGcg-ZVboGEf6KSZ+fKW8r3H2-_X1PCoxq31g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Dictionaries?
From: Benson Margulies <bimargulies@gmail.com>
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

What portion of the historical collection of spelling dictionaries
have travelled into the AOO project? Once upon a time, the dictionary
source data for various languages was marked up with all sorts of
'category X' licenses. Have any of these been relicensed or otherwise
pulled under the AL umbrella?