Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AEB76E4C0 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 20:41:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11692 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2013 20:41:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 11459 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2013 20:41:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 11439 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2013 20:41:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 20:41:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (nike.apache.org: transitioning domain of hagar.delest@laposte.net does not designate 212.27.42.1 as permitted sender) Received: from [212.27.42.1] (HELO smtp1-g21.free.fr) (212.27.42.1) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 20:41:22 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [83.153.184.98]) by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AADFF9401EB for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 21:40:58 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <510AD6D9.4060700@laposte.net> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 21:40:57 +0100 From: Hagar Delest User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20130117 Thunderbird/19.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Apache OpenOffice in Fedora 19? References: <5109384E.60606@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Le 31/01/2013 00:10, Rob Weir a �crit : > This is a great step, Andrea. Apache OpenOffice has many Linux users. > We see this in the download numbers. But today the install > experience is, like many things in Linux, more complicated than the > average immigrant from Windows-land is accustomed to. So making this > real simple will be key. Especially true with Ubuntu: installing AOO is a nightmare for beginners because of the integration of the default application in the system. The application that gets installed by default has a real advantage. Hagar