Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of marcus.mail@wtnet.de
 designates 84.46.103.118 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <50F5DCF4.2050900@wtnet.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 23:49:24 +0100
From: "Marcus (OOo)" <marcus.mail@wtnet.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de;
 rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD port status
References: <1358288697.87684.YahooMailNeo@web162101.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <1358288697.87684.YahooMailNeo@web162101.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Am 01/15/2013 11:24 PM, schrieb Pedro Giffuni:
> Just a small update;
>
> The main set of patches for building on FreeBSD were committed
> before 3.4 Release. I have been slowly committing the remaining
> FreeBSD patches trying to avoid interfering with other platforms.
> All this work has been done by Maho.
>
> If someone notices breakage after Revision 1433680 (a one line
> removal), let me know so that it can be reverted.
>
> The only remaining issue to have a direct  build from the sources is
> reported in Bugzilla i118574 and doesn't seem easy to solve cleanly.
>
> I have been updating some components to match what we use in
> FreeBSD, but the port is still fragile for two reasons:
> - internal icu.
> - stlport.
>
> The first needs to be updated and the second needs to die. Both issues
> are also key to get a working clang port and would help greatly
> MacOS X.
>
> In any case the status is  ...  the port works and has been shipping for a while!
>
> cheers,
>
> Pedro.

Thats great news. Thanks a lot, Pedro and Maho, for your endless effort 
to support and keeping up-to-date this port on FreeBSD.

Marcus