Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jogischmidt@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.83.46 as permitted sender)
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 07:35:04 +0100
From: Juergen Schmidt <jogischmidt@gmail.com>
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Message-ID: <289E4974E4264D5D88A841E5C89FF76B@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CACGw4H573EPfbsqq7+sRtNRC6PhbugSWWy_kNsHHCDOVQAAU6g@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CACGw4H6vZ9NqiU6LSU8O=9Yx7m6X+yxNTw+0jeQ5ceb=6Z-m=Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAP-ksoiJVzpzWNBLbMZCLSii_AeRxZ78PRsWHMF9ePgZ-voFvg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMK9kTgEMxuBHS6mOEZOjnjFNSSFX5bikDd49eOZvO1Nk7LwOQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACGw4H573EPfbsqq7+sRtNRC6PhbugSWWy_kNsHHCDOVQAAU6g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: OpenOffice thin client edition - why not?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="50f8ed18_4516dde9_11aa"

--50f8ed18_4516dde9_11aa
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Am =46reitag, 18. Januar 2013 um 05:18 schrieb =46ernando Cassia:
> On =46ri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Alexandro Colorado <jza=40oooes.org=
> wrote:
> > It wasnt an edition more like a mode, you did =24 soffice -net and yo=
u can
> > have variou users conenected, there was a pertner that even did some =
Active
> > Directory authentication.
> > http://openofficetechnology.com/products/OpenOffice-Enterprise
> > =20
> =20
> =20
> =20

I think you mix some things here =20
> =20
> Yea but was that code ever part of OO.o =3F guess not...
no =20
> =20
> Wouldn=C2=B4t it be nice to package AOO for easy thin client operation=3F=

> Like Rob says... iPads are the new thin clients...
> =20
> =20

having a solution for this kind of devices would be of course nice.

Juergen =20
> =20
> And IMHO what yesterday was considered =22Network Computing=22 could be=

> today=C2=B4s =22private cloud=22. :)
> =20
> =46C =20


--50f8ed18_4516dde9_11aa--