Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jancasacondor@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.46 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CACbjkN6MnrgzTNz1=tFffeuUWsxWSARO42BwHHBw=6Y3KL4ONQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAK2iWdRWQYCtbb3vDtwGh4Sk3KocB2ee9QizLiGdAw_qSoxizw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACbjkN6MnrgzTNz1=tFffeuUWsxWSARO42BwHHBw=6Y3KL4ONQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 11:35:27 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAK2iWdS1KibaQvTBDCGrRt7h1-XRdOeWDWkGEBnw4JgkjwZ5kw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [early codereview / check for standards] genLang in l10ntools
From: jan iversen <jancasacondor@gmail.com>
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0442879e16630204cdd12932

--f46d0442879e16630204cdd12932
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I have made a description of a new workflow, where this code is only part
of it. I do not know it you have seen otherwise here is a link:

http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Localization_AOO/new_proposal

Jan.

On 6 November 2012 10:54, Dwayne Bailey <dwayne@translate.org.za> wrote:

> On 4 November 2012 12:55, jan iversen <jancasacondor@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > I have finished the control part of the new localization tool, and before
> > I walk further down the line (writing/converting all the translations
> > parts) I would like to have checked if the code is ok in terms of
> standard,
> > readability and expectations (from other C++ programmers).
> >
> > I hope one of the C++ programmers, can have a quick look at the code and
> > tell me:
> > - Are the code written in accordance with the AOO standards (I think so)
> > - Is it in general in accordance with the AOO writing style.
> >
> > Of course, I would very much like to hear if there are non-efficient /
> > malicious code in there, but please remember this is only the control
> > skeleton, so there are a lot of code missing.
> >
>
> Hi Jan, I just wanted to check what the target format was.  It looks like
> XLIFF from the example in one header, is that correct? Or are you still
> wanting to target PO? There are pro's and con's to each. PS the XLIFF
> extension is .xlf not .xliff.
>
>
> >
> > I try to include a zip file with this mail, should I not succeed, then
> > please respond to the mail and I will sent it directly.
> >
> > MANY Thanks in advance for the help.
> > Jan.
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Dwayne
>
> *Translate*
> +27 12 460 1095
>

--f46d0442879e16630204cdd12932--