Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EF164D1EC for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 01:04:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89840 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2012 01:04:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 89773 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2012 01:04:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 89765 invoked by uid 99); 6 Nov 2012 01:04:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 01:04:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yanji.yj@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.46 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.46] (HELO mail-vb0-f46.google.com) (209.85.212.46) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 01:04:11 +0000 Received: by mail-vb0-f46.google.com with SMTP id ff1so7958264vbb.33 for ; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 17:03:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=wv+5qSzbfFS6rW13jPBMruE/UkdiErjBpFYPsEVHV4g=; b=qR5OEiIdKdFfaOeSkcJKyxz6E/p3qtJQ86gW7JXRuMakjWrHwMrn/oUP/Hs9bWghYW +q0faY08qOEGyODu4UzhQlj6HE6rD7gqSYyUg+zflLNL06mEUHe3VpkUi86wCRaBpLef BYYScxgdgeXvHgOWoyaSA8QAgCz7Ka/quuaf5TiSxZ6JMGw7wtv7TNgCDboq51/m++1G 3Bpa5jDiT10GPUH7TL5t3M1P3qqiiMAvteRBB4LawwWdzPaKNSrOs+RIxWdIxU6fcfs5 2/lhIwd0DxHlLhxsXRLi82QNRs/+e0oxdp7n/1QZUb/aZT+In6+gamFQeGSs/UKoHXZy 9TBA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.116.84 with SMTP id l20mr11210734vcq.36.1352163830823; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 17:03:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.221.13.193 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 17:03:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50979F3A.9030809@apache.org> References: <5093AE0C.20904@apache.org> <50979F3A.9030809@apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 09:03:50 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [BZ]How does vote function work From: Ji Yan To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0438ed03d079d504cdc92c76 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d0438ed03d079d504cdc92c76 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 If "most voted" defect is feature request or enhancement, can we change its issue type to reflect its reality, so that we can still focus on the "most voted" defect. 2012/11/5 Andrea Pescetti > Ji Yan wrote: > >> IMHO, in each milestone, we should have backlog defects fix plan. To give >> this defect list, what's criteria should be? High severity, high usability >> impact defects of course should be in that list, in the meanwhile, can we >> also add some defects which have more votes? >> > > Yes, but in those cases I'd suggest to have a developer familiar with that > component assess whether those issues are feasible or not. > > If I recall correctly, most of the "most voted" issues are feature > requests rather than bug reports; in this case they should be evaluated > first. > > Regards, > Andrea. > -- Thanks & Best Regards, Yan Ji --f46d0438ed03d079d504cdc92c76--