openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Rist <>
Subject Re: Fake OpenOffice site?
Date Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:37:15 GMT
<snip snip>

On 2/2/2012 4:50 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> On 2012-02-01 9:01 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>> 1) Oracle contributed the source code and trademarks 
>> to Apache
> Really?  I thought Oracle granted a license of most of the 
> source code to Apache, not all of it.  If they had 
> granted a license of all the source code, we'd probably be about a 
> month further along in the schedule, maybe?  But we've done amazing 
> work filling in the pieces and making the current Apache OpenOffice 
> releases work while ensuring we only use permissively licensed code.
Hey Shane - probably just an issue with wording, but just want to add 
this to the discussion...
Oracle granted a license to the stuff that Oracle had clear copyright 
ownership on.  I don't think there is anything owned by Oracle that was 
not donated - especially nothing that is pushing the schedule back at 
this point.
There are a lot of non-Sun/Oracle code used by the project (some of it 
copyleft) - obviously this could not be 'donated' by Oracle.
It is the remediation of this code that has been the source of the last 
few months of work - mostly copyleft dependencies and 'extensions' (I'm 
thinking dictionaries and the like here)


View raw message