Return-Path: 
 <ooo-dev-return-4765-apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 828777151
	for <apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Fri,  2 Sep 2011 14:46:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 47527 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2011 14:46:24 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 47258 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2011 14:46:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ooo-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <ooo-dev.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 47249 invoked by uid 99); 2 Sep 2011 14:46:23 -0000
Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 14:46:23 +0000
Received: from localhost (HELO mail-ey0-f173.google.com) (127.0.0.1)
  (smtp-auth username robweir, mechanism plain)
  by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP;
 Fri, 02 Sep 2011 14:46:22 +0000
Received: by eyb7 with SMTP id 7so2546359eyb.18
        for <ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org>;
 Fri, 02 Sep 2011 07:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.14.14.155 with SMTP id d27mr312282eed.189.1314974781159; Fri,
 02 Sep 2011 07:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.188.2 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 07:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPFNckhs3T9outbU6_qSbAz0rJwzs6Y+8BJT4T+OD3_jQV92Fw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4E5FB6F0.2060504@ellisons.org.uk>
	<CAP-ksoirgnV8Bvf_i_u2yN3gK66keWgKpZX+9LDvaqi2z-UN9w@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E5FC756.5010106@ellisons.org.uk>
	<CAP-ksoiK2TL0gQje-FmbjuxFCVDDhoNVuB6xeMcCd0bBZB71Qg@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E5FD55C.40207@ellisons.org.uk>
	<CAP-ksohXHc5FRd=x2D82T7xY37i+GRtxh6FbENmy+gSyiwp90g@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E5FE090.2020506@apache.org>
	<CAP-ksojj4z0Ne45FcPcu-yUstQ5MdAf4gYqWdLZvHCgbFbRDKQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<014801cc68e5$d5fd5290$81f7f7b0$@acm.org>
	<CAP-ksoiCVS5F6wG=JrwpuZYCuSte6WpdkNhZZT9B+xLWS+QfQw@mail.gmail.com>
	<1314911707.1938.55.camel@sybil>
	<CAP-ksoj=tqVBoFTso7jHc4qjki6giBqBYBAe5oFn7OKo=p5L9Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E60193C.4090304@shanecurcuru.org>
	<4E606C19.40005@ellisons.org.uk>
	<CAPFNckir_z5XzckS-1Hf-CvjKaDXThOr43gk8uPUiSXqOfwfKQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP-ksogPkfM88_Tis+7BOBXroTG_qGOymzGADu-p3znjHZ+NMg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPFNckg38wiNbz22mBd6EGDwLYVk2s=iTzK1_Ui8+f4=TSV6Eg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP-ksohZzsKwb8fL=iyE37ea=ii9-62VW5BHaHOeQ9ZZ7zKRtg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPFNckhs3T9outbU6_qSbAz0rJwzs6Y+8BJT4T+OD3_jQV92Fw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 10:46:21 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAP-ksoiuFQT-Hn42mU=TTjSM_f1ACfKppBdk8gRg14dN+migOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: An invitation to committers to the OOo Community Forums
From: Rob Weir <robweir@apache.org>
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Christian Grobmeier <grobmeier@gmail.com> wrote:

<snip>

<
> What, if a the click on the "ban" button does send an email to the
> private@ mailinglist?
> As I heard it is the phpBB board which is used, so only a online is
> necessary for that.
> It would also conform to "commit then review"guidelines. ;-)
> It would be good, if the click on the ban button needs a ban comment -
> to my knowledge this comment is already implemented in phpBB. The
> comment point to a discussion thread in which the moderators have
> discussed their action. Any PPMC can then have an oversight on this.
>
> Of course, all moderation actions allowed for that board need a
> similar functionality.
>
> In addition, I think it is possible to send "new topics" in a
> moderation board to the private list. Then the PPMC is even aware of
> newly starting discussions and can follow if they want.
>
> What do you think about that?
>

It is hard to disagree with that idea, especially since I proposed
something similar yesterday:

http://markmail.org/message/a5hxqjnkh655xdvy

I list the reasons there.

-Rob


> Cheers
> Christian
>
>>
>> -Rob
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.grobmeier.de
>