Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E9F07B60 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 08:48:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64271 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2011 08:48:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 64157 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2011 08:48:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 64144 invoked by uid 99); 2 Sep 2011 08:48:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 08:48:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jeanweber@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.175] (HELO mail-iy0-f175.google.com) (209.85.210.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 08:48:17 +0000 Received: by iagz35 with SMTP id z35so2919074iag.6 for ; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 01:47:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=B79RyIaw4Rj5QXargyV9AugtQ+IB+gNvxHYcpR0af2Q=; b=HlGHE/O0f8xW/XS6zZ98cSH5gpAx7Rsea3YnWX+6UCrI4qCr+yiD6E+K5U8A3Kps80 9z0LAxqWCBpdRklbLKQobqdnfecUNUUA1SZ50R1nt40bSmNu+hVp1YDJWaHC343qKekw ogFxMt7VIcUVRSye7mnBCmjHzCKzZ8+41pQ9c= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.54.161 with SMTP id q33mr1587073ibg.30.1314953277091; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 01:47:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.209.76 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 01:47:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201109011434.32961.nn.libo@kflog.org> References: <201109011434.32961.nn.libo@kflog.org> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 18:47:57 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: Fwd: If we had the resources, what could/would/should we do? From: Jean Weber To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I asked on the ODFAuthors list for others' comments. Here is the one response I've had so far. --Jean ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Nino Novak Date: Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 22:34 Subject: Re: [odfauthors-discuss] If we had the resources, what could/would/should we do? To: ODFAuthors Am Donnerstag, 1. September 2011, um 07:13:14 schrieb Jean Weber: > So... what would you like to see as documentation/user support for > AOOo? Here is a first rough collection of requirements/ideas/wishes which may need being discussed/prioritized/concretized a bit ;) * a centralized integrated documentation place for all flavours + forks of the OOo/LibO family * very good searchability (I doubt Google is sufficient?) * sync'ed multilanguage documentation (e.g. like php or mysql docs) * immediate availability of any document in any of the main delivery formats (HTML, PDF, ODT) - best generated "on the fly" or regenerated on any change from a master * support for "filtered views" (showing only the documentation for a given combination of software flavour/fork + Version + Language) * support for a reviewing workflow similar to ODFAuthors or Alfresco * support for translation workflow with fallback to original language (or English or whatever) * support for translations in any direction (not only from en-> other) * arbitrary diff support (not only between two history versions of a page like in the wiki but between any two pages/documents) * nice2have: integration of translation memory with GUI l10n * nice2have: interlinks with application help * end user commentable pages * easy community involvment (with a well thought or configurable rights hierarchy for e.g. typo correctors, editors, reviewers, document publishers etc.) * licence agreement on any edit or on account creation (or both?) * mail notification on page change with author + comment (best with optionally included diff) * votable pages to see what is considered high/low quality * good statistics to see ** what infos are searched most ** what search terms are used ** what is missing most * enhanced credits page (who - what - changed word counts, how many per last month / last year / totaletc.) Regards, Nino