Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
In-Reply-To: <4E67CE0E.5090601@laposte.net>
References: 
 <CAP-ksoi8xzLsqawHRPsTRNatSisFWQjnsO30pS+5doouQfB1Mg@mail.gmail.com>
 <4E654A51.90508@laposte.net>
 <CAPFNckjijUXaqCam=GpMfPQhsJjvka1J_SixaE_rAYa18CYzyg@mail.gmail.com>
 <009601cc6ca5$1bbb11b0$53313510$@acm.org> <1315322952.1994.69.camel@sybil>
 <127E542A-2E40-4EF7-90E6-04FC48F01C75@free.fr> <4E67CE0E.5090601@laposte.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-15--30556726
Message-Id: <99ED69DF-0612-4E84-9EAF-627C61B75A83@free.fr>
From: eric b <eric.bachard@free.fr>
Subject: [OT] What is needed for Support Forums to be fully integrated into
 the Apache OpenOffice.org project
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 23:39:35 +0200
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org

--Apple-Mail-15--30556726
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=UTF-8;
	delsp=yes;
	format=flowed

Hi  ******  ,


Le 7 sept. 11 =C3=A0 22:03, Hagar Delest a =C3=A9crit :

> Le mar. 06 sept. 2011 17:36:10 CEST, eric b =20
> <eric.bachardNOSPAM@free.fr> a =C3=A9crit :
>> No, Hagar introduced his pseudo, not himself.
>> I wonder how we can trust people we don't know the identity ?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Eric
> First note that I'm not a PPMC or haven't any other role for the =20
> moment in ASF.
>

Not verifiable, and pointless in the discussion.


> The key persons in the forums and some in the ASF do know my identity.


I read you consider some important people desserve to know your =20
identity, but not the "simple joe".


> The ASF gives the possibility to get a public alias even when we =20
> sign the iCLA.


That's a very bad thing. If so, it would mean some are the VIP ... =20
and the other people are "simple people" in the Apache Foundation ?


> So it means that there is no issue with using an alias. That's part =20=

> of the Internet.
>


We are not in the clouds, mention the bad side of the Internet is not =20=

a good answer either, and FYI, this is no longer true : see the =20
current Google war around fake accounts: everybody must being =20
identifiable.

Legally, I have even some doubts.


> What would be the point knowing my identity? My real name has quite =20=

> no visibility on the web because I don't have any occupation having =20=

> a public aspect.


Again, nobody, excepted not identified people you pretend aware, can =20
confirm.


> I don't believe in Facebook and so on for example so no account.
> I think my credential in oooforum and user.services forum is the =20
> only point to be taken into account.


Imagine several people, all working in the same company, all paid to =20
provide support, and having the same login password ? I know I'm =20
exagerating, but there is no risk after all ...


> Therefore I take your comment as rather insulting.
>

There is nothing insulting inmy comment, and well, I could say the =20
same about you.


To be frank, more you insist, and more your behavior looks =20
suspicious. AFAIK, I read all people are equal in the Apache =20
Foundation, and there is sane legitimity to ask everybody in the =20
group to respect the minimum : being truely identifiable.

The question is imho very important : is it allowed to cheat with the =20=

identity, inside the Apache Foundation ? I sincerily expect the =20
answer is no.


Eric Bachard
>

--=20
q=C9=94=E1=B4=89=C9=B9=C9=99
Education Project:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Education_Project
Projet OOo4Kids : http://wiki.ooo4kids.org/index.php/Main_Page
L'association EducOOo : http://www.educoo.org
Blog : http://eric.bachard.org/news


--Apple-Mail-15--30556726--