Return-Path: 
 <ooo-dev-return-4655-apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 73283836C
	for <apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Thu,  1 Sep 2011 17:57:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 44904 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2011 17:57:07 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 44856 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2011 17:57:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ooo-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <ooo-dev.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 44848 invoked by uid 99); 1 Sep 2011 17:57:06 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:57:06 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [94.136.40.61] (HELO mailex.mailcore.me) (94.136.40.61)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:56:58 +0000
Received: from host86-129-239-17.range86-129.btcentralplus.com
 ([86.129.239.17] helo=[192.168.1.69])
	by mail10.atlas.pipex.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Terry@ellisons.org.uk>)
	id 1QzBVG-0000pd-Fr
	for ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 18:56:38 +0100
Message-ID: <4E5FC756.5010106@ellisons.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 18:56:38 +0100
From: Terry Ellison <Terry@ellisons.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110805 Thunderbird/3.1.12
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: An invitation to committers to the OOo Community Forums
References: <4E5FB6F0.2060504@ellisons.org.uk>
 <CAP-ksoirgnV8Bvf_i_u2yN3gK66keWgKpZX+9LDvaqi2z-UN9w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAP-ksoirgnV8Bvf_i_u2yN3gK66keWgKpZX+9LDvaqi2z-UN9w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailcore-Auth: 8445677
X-Mailcore-Domain: 884398
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Rob,

This was a polite invitation to committers if they wanted to see how the 
forums operate.  I will take your -1 to mean that you don't want to take 
me up on the offer.

Your reply is a valid topic but entirely off *this* topic.  
Unfortunately since this is a DL and not a forum, I can't move this to 
new topic which relates to your point.  However, if you care to make 
this on another thread on the topic you discuss, then I will reply there.

Can we try to maintain some thread discipline, please?

Regards
Terry

On 01/09/11 17:59, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Terry Ellison<Terry@ellisons.org.uk>  wrote:
>> Anyone is able to join the OOo Community forums, but we also have a number
>> of closed forums use for internal management of the site.  If any committers
>> would like to have access to these, then just make sure that they've got an
>> active account on the current production service (not ooo-forums.apache.org)
>> and email me me from it requesting access.  I will then raise you to
>> "volunteer" so that you can see the main closed forums.
>>
> -1
>
> I propose that we eliminate any such "internal management" forums...<snip>
>