Return-Path: 
 <ooo-dev-return-5073-apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9EB238503
	for <apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Mon,  5 Sep 2011 16:53:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 71488 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2011 16:53:05 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 71426 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2011 16:53:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ooo-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <ooo-dev.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 71418 invoked by uid 99); 5 Sep 2011 16:53:04 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:53:04 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=5.0
	tests=HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [213.233.128.45] (HELO mail3.vodafone.ie) (213.233.128.45)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:52:57 +0000
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: 
 AtsGAFz9ZE5tTcMC/2dsb2JhbABDmRePAXiBRgEBBTpPCAMNOVcZFIdhuH2DTIMeBJhbi2E
Received: from unknown (HELO 100AkerWood) ([109.77.195.2])
  by mail3.vodafone.ie with SMTP; 05 Sep 2011 17:52:37 +0100
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 17:52:35 +0100
From: Rory O'Farrell <ofarrwrk@iol.ie>
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Dissatisfaction amongst the community admins, moderators and
 volunteers
Message-Id: <20110905175235.aad84bfad53b166a60c073e2@iol.ie>
In-Reply-To: <00a401cc6be9$bb748770$325d9650$@acm.org>
References: <4E6361AE.3070907@ellisons.org.uk>
	<CAP-ksoh62Vqb9VYp26VkqaHvr5O55-vesa32qK5qow=DCyOehA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E638B48.9020200@ellisons.org.uk>
	<CAP-ksoggKBhy80YGxPEFuqSe=4aHtOLCOv6eOukxe4mwQtwzgA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA4ffp-ybjGS5TWmOHumid9XgDyU_pPFF0OodvUMMMyczNa7ow@mail.gmail.com>
	<1315157787.63820.YahooMailNeo@web161423.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
	<CAP-ksoipe9TxxbL6qCOyjF6xSpRw6-8NJfpQpm3NwCA+pqZ5Bg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1315159969.15159.39.camel@sybil>
	<20110905122829.GA26336@daniel3.local>
	<00a401cc6be9$bb748770$325d9650$@acm.org>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0beta2 (GTK+ 2.24.4; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 09:34:48 -0700
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> wrote:

><snip>> 
> Whether to move to deletion or simply expunge immediately might be a choice of the moderator.  I do not know.  

In general, blatant spam posts, advertising sales sites, are immediately expunged.  Sites which have live advertising links in their .sig may be moderator adjusted and the User advised that such links are contrary to Forum terms of use.  Questionable postings, where the moderator hasn't time to follow up a link to check, or where he wants other opinions, are quarantined (auto expunge after 3 days); also suspicious postings which we suspect are probing the Forum to build up a "valid" history may be quarantined - I'm thinking of one series of postings current, with similar naming options, an identical .sig, and which make no contribution to the discussion; currently we have received 50-100 of these (a guess - who is counting?).  
-- 
Rory O'Farrell <ofarrwrk@iol.ie>