Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E3C2E7C6B for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:14:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66197 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2011 16:14:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 66154 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2011 16:14:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 66145 invoked by uid 99); 6 Sep 2011 16:14:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:14:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [205.178.146.66] (HELO omr16.networksolutionsemail.com) (205.178.146.66) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:14:27 +0000 Received: from cm-omr14 (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by omr16.networksolutionsemail.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p86GE1pO000901 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 12:14:05 -0400 Authentication-Results: cm-omr14 smtp.user=drew@baseanswers.com; auth=pass (PLAIN) X-Authenticated-UID: drew@baseanswers.com Received: from [174.140.78.93] ([174.140.78.93:40860] helo=[192.168.1.2]) by cm-omr14 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.41 r(31179/31189)) with ESMTPA id 1C/A7-16309-0C6466E4; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 12:14:01 -0400 Subject: Re: What is needed for Support Forums to be fully integrated into the Apache OpenOffice.org project From: drew To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org In-Reply-To: References: <4E654A51.90508@laposte.net> <009601cc6ca5$1bbb11b0$53313510$@acm.org> <4E663F41.3090503@btconnect.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 12:13:50 -0400 Message-ID: <1315325630.1994.75.camel@sybil> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 11:57 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 11:41 AM, David McKay wrote: > > > > On 06/09/2011 15:56, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > >> > >> Christian, > >> > >> What I find awkward around all of these discussions is that there are > >> already several Apache OOo PPMC members who were and are already > >> administrators and moderators on the OpenOffice.org forums, and not one of > >> them stood up here, on ooo-dev, and said so. > >> > >> It boggles my mind how much withholding is going on. > >> > >> - Dennis > > > > Not strictly true. I've said several times that I was a moderator on the > > forums. This is getting to too much like the emperor's new clothes. > > > > Does it have to be more complicated than this: agree the high-level points > > and them work out the detail. As far as i can see the main points are as > > follows. > > > > 1) The forums bring great value to the Ooo community and project alike. The > > more help the end users get the better. The more bugs that are brought to > > our attention and find their way into bugzilla the better. It is already one > > well-founded and respected face of OOo to the outside world. > > > > 2) The forums need a new home. > > > > 3) For that home to be under the Apache umbrella, as a minimum, it requires > > some tweaking of the forum management/administration, or at least, a > > permanent visible record of the management/administration actions. > > > > 4) Collaboratively, we ought to be able to get this done. > > > > All nice statements. But we had nice statements before. It is time > to back up nice statements with a true common understanding, including > a written proposal from this autonomous forum volunteers on how they > wish to operate within the AOOo project, a proposal that the entire > PPMC can review and disucss and hopefully approve. Yes that will come later today - (at least I'll try to get it that quickly if I can) //drew > > This level of formality, having an actual proposal, will raising the > level of discourse from from bitter arguments on the list to saying > actually what you plan to do. It also makes the understanding > concrete and memorializes it so both the forum volunteers and the PPMC > can refer to it in the future when memories fade. > > Remember, we don't create a new mailing list in this project without > someone actually submitting a proposal and having a discussion. We > should not be migrating years of content, bring on board 75 new > project volunteers with a very different operating style, with many > connections to the rest of the AOOo and Apache Infra, without having > that same level of diligence. > > In any area that has been rife with misunderstandings, this is not the > place to rush. We should tone down the discussions and hash out the > details with greater civility. But let's take our time and ensure > that we're all on common ground when this is over. > > > > Dave. > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Christian Grobmeier [mailto:grobmeier@gmail.com] > >> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 02:58 > >> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: What is needed for Support Forums to be fully integrated into > >> the Apache OpenOffice.org project > >> > >>> We are a group of users who believes in OOo. > >>> We like to help other users through forums (some like ML, we prefer > >>> forum, > >>> that's life). > >> > >> This all and then tons of work you already have done (up to 18.000 > >> posts!!) should make you eligible as an ASF committer. > >> > >> Cheers > >> > >> [ ... ] > >> > >> > > >