Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 41FDE7A9E for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 18:11:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67732 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2011 18:11:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 67676 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2011 18:11:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 67668 invoked by uid 99); 4 Sep 2011 18:11:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 18:11:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [205.178.146.59] (HELO omr9.networksolutionsemail.com) (205.178.146.59) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 18:11:16 +0000 Received: from cm-omr7 (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by omr9.networksolutionsemail.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p84IAkf4014366 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 14:10:46 -0400 Authentication-Results: cm-omr7 smtp.user=drew@baseanswers.com; auth=pass (PLAIN) X-Authenticated-UID: drew@baseanswers.com Received: from [174.140.78.93] ([174.140.78.93:49534] helo=[192.168.1.3]) by cm-omr7 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.41 r(31179/31189)) with ESMTPA id 2C/DF-30632-62FB36E4; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 14:10:46 -0400 Subject: Re: Dissatisfaction amongst the community admins, moderators and volunteers From: drew To: Joe Schaefer Cc: "ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <1315159435.71863.YahooMailNeo@web161425.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> References: <4E6361AE.3070907@ellisons.org.uk> <4E638B48.9020200@ellisons.org.uk> <1315157787.63820.YahooMailNeo@web161423.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <1315159012.15159.26.camel@sybil> <1315159435.71863.YahooMailNeo@web161425.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 14:10:50 -0400 Message-ID: <1315159850.15159.37.camel@sybil> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 11:03 -0700, Joe Schaefer wrote: > Drew, > > To the best of my ability I am trying to express > the true concerns of the org, as I have come to > know them over my time here. At this time I don't > see the need for any major changes to the status > quo (if it ain't broke don't fix it). Just trying > to convey what the organizational requirements actually > are, not to insist that anything be done to accomodate > them *right now*. > > > Of course it'd be smart to allow anyone from the > infrastructure team to inspect those forums, but as > a practical matter most of us are already members of > the org. And I take Terry's offer towards ooo > committers at face-value that it is a standing offer > good for the lifetime of the project. Yes and I'll back it up also, actually it is like that for everyone - Anyone - if they are active on the forum can gain membership in that group. The volunteer group is already 75 people..nothing happens at the forums that this group does not have access to. //drew