openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dennis E. Hamilton" <>
Subject RE: Legacy OOo list post stats
Date Sat, 03 Sep 2011 17:27:14 GMT
1. Yes, the condensation within language groups is a good idea.

2. I meant the dual-language posts in the case where we notify folks on the NL groups about
the English language ooo-*.i.a.o lists now.  And I meant for notices on the current NL lists.
 I think another thing to include in such notices, if we made them, is to indicate where progress
information (albeit in English) on migration and other matters can be found (including
for now).

 - Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Weir [] 
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2011 10:17
Subject: Re: Legacy OOo list post stats

On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
<> wrote:
> Interesting data.
> I think we should let the NL lists know about the English-language counterparts on i.a.o,
using the native language if possible, but I don't think we should regard our en lists as

[ ... ]

2) Functionalist and NL lists but not matrixed.  So ooo-dev, ooo-doc,
ooo-private, etc. but then ooo-general-fr, ooo-general-de,
ooo-general-jp, etc.

The thing that recommends approach #2 is that we have seen how a
single list --- ooo-dev -- can handle 60 posts/day, so long as we are
sensitive to thread drift, using subject tags, not posting
unnecessarily, etc. So it should be possible to have the NL languages
on general lists without too much difficulty.  We're doing that in
English, right?

> The only safe way I know to do that would be to have a simple-English statement for all
of them and then prepend a native language equivalent to each one posted.  We can try Google
translator unless we have someone here who can do that better as an user of the native language.
> I also wouldn't post to any of those non-English lists until we can figure out whether
they have an administrator actually in attendance and posting won't create more problems than
it solves.

If we create language-specific general lists, that would solve the
problem right? The moderators of the general lists could be
responsible for contacting the relevant legacy OOo lists, and helping
them move over.  This could include sharing information on the other
project lists that are in English.

>  - Dennis
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Weir []
> Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2011 09:41
> To:
> Subject: Legacy OOo list post stats
> To help prioritize the list migration efforts, I've collected numbers
> from the legacy OOo lists.  Looking at 2011 posts, year to date, these
> are the average posts/day for the most-used lists.
> I've arbitrarily cut-off the lost at lists having more than one post
> every other day.  There are 332 lists overall that I could find, most
> of them getting little to no traffic.   To put these numbers in
> perspective note that our ooo-dev list averages 59 posts per day. So
> we know what that traffic feels like.   If we add up all of the top
> 100 OOo lists, excluding the Bugzilla notifications, they add up to 62
> posts/day average.
> So I think this argues strongly for list consolidation.  Direct all
> user-related lists to ooo-users and project-related lists to ooo-dev.
> List Posts/day
> org.openoffice.allbugs  54.8
> org.openoffice.users    9.0
> 7.9
>   4.1
> 3.6
>        3.2
>      3.2
> org.openoffice.user-faq.authors 2.9
> org.openoffice.discuss  2.5
> 1.6
> org.openoffice.dba.needsconfirm 1.3
>    1.2
>    1.2
>  1.1
> org.openoffice.ja.discuss       1.0
> org.openoffice.releases 0.9
> org.openoffice.allcvs   0.9
>   0.9
>   0.9
> 0.9
> 0.8
> org.openoffice.cws-announce     0.8
>   0.7
>    0.7
> 0.7
>        0.7
> org.openoffice.distribution.cdrom       0.6

View raw message