Mailing-List: contact users-help@openjpa.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@openjpa.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of curtisr7@gmail.com designates
 209.85.218.46 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAFvvX=YMrtw+HdgFSampLr3OBYPSyvGXu7oq2fJd3j=YqbgwSw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAFvvX=YMrtw+HdgFSampLr3OBYPSyvGXu7oq2fJd3j=YqbgwSw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 08:15:51 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAP=qHCv5NRcegGjsCDhdikg6=rHTnkbcz_QTCG-8YfETGtDuKA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: exclude-unlisted-classes ignored
From: Rick Curtis <curtisr7@gmail.com>
To: users <users@openjpa.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01228b1ae41e860504341056

--089e01228b1ae41e860504341056
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

It sounds like this is working as expected. Excerpt from the spec :

<xsd:element name="exclude-unlisted-classes" type="xsd:boolean"
default="true" minOccurs="0">
<xsd:annotation>
<xsd:documentation>
When set to true then only listed classes and jars will
be scanned for persistent classes, otherwise the
enclosing jar or directory will also be scanned.
Not applicable to Java SE persistence units.
</xsd:documentation>
</xsd:annotation>
</xsd:element>

On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Mansour Al Akeel <
mansour.alakeel@gmail.com> wrote:

> When creating EntityManagerFactory using OpenEJB,
> exclude-unlisted-classes works as expected. However, when creating it
> directly as in:
>
>
> props.setProperty("javax.persistence.jdbc.driver", this.driver);
>     props.setProperty("javax.persistence.jdbc.url", this.url);
>     props.setProperty("javax.persistence.jdbc.user", this.username);
>     props.setProperty("javax.persistence.jdbc.password", this.password);
>
>     props.setProperty("javax.persistence.transactionType",
> PersistenceUnitTransactionType.RESOURCE_LOCAL.name());
>
>     EntityManagerFactory emf =
> Persistence.createEntityManagerFactory(null, props);
>
>
> The classes are not scanned. The only classes that are loaded and
> created tables into the DB are those listed in the persistence.xml
>
> I noticed that openejb and openjpa has their own implementation of
> PersistenceUnitInfoImpl.
>
> I just need to confirm if this is a bug, or I am missing something.
>
>
> Thank you.
>


-- 
*Rick Curtis*

--089e01228b1ae41e860504341056--