From issues-return-81749-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@nifi.apache.org Thu Jul 25 15:02:02 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F7A5180697 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 17:02:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 23463 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2019 15:02:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@nifi.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@nifi.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@nifi.apache.org Received: (qmail 23443 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jul 2019 15:02:02 -0000 Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (HELO mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.139) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 15:02:02 +0000 Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 12608E2F4D for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 15:02:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 6F612265F3 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 15:02:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 15:02:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Mr TheSegfault (JIRA)" To: issues@nifi.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Comment Edited] (MINIFICPP-985) Implement listvalidators MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-985?page=3Dcom.atlass= ian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D1= 6892852#comment-16892852 ]=20 Mr TheSegfault edited comment on MINIFICPP-985 at 7/25/19 3:01 PM: ------------------------------------------------------------------- Why would we choose list validation over allowable values? that is already = supported and encapsulates this, no? was (Author: phrocker): Why would we choose list validation over allowable values? that is already = supported and a better application IMO. > Implement listvalidators > ------------------------ > > Key: MINIFICPP-985 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-985 > Project: Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++ > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.6.0 > Reporter: Arpad Boda > Assignee: Arpad Boda > Priority: Major > Fix For: 0.7.0 > > > As [~nghiaxlee] pointed out in a change we don't have the functionality t= o create list validators (in which case all elements of the input lists sho= uld be validated using an encapsulated validator), so we can't validate mul= tiple choice properties for eg.=C2=A0 > The change itself is quite easy, although we should keep in mind C2 integ= ration. Because of this [~phrocker] and [~kdoran] I would like to ask for y= our feedback on adding this into agent manifest. Thanks in advance! > I scoped this for 0.7.0 as the MiNiFi impact would be small, however I ca= n accept rescheduling it to 0.8.0 in case C2 integration requires more effo= rt and testing. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.14#76016)