Mailing-List: contact issues-help@nifi.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@nifi.apache.org
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 09:03:00 +0000 (UTC)
From: "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: issues@nifi.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.13043346.1487185881000.82728.1501750980150@Atlassian.JIRA>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.13043346.1487185881000@Atlassian.JIRA>
References: <JIRA.13043346.1487185881000@Atlassian.JIRA> <JIRA.13043346.1487185881546@jira-lw-us.apache.org>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (NIFI-3484) GenerateTableFetch Should Allow for
 Right Boundary
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
archived-at: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 09:03:06 -0000


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16112452#comment-16112452 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-3484:
--------------------------------------

Github user patricker commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1513
  
    @pvillard31 Thanks. There have been some more changes recently to GenerateTableFetch. Let me work through the rebase.


> GenerateTableFetch Should Allow for Right Boundary
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-3484
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3484
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Core Framework
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.0
>            Reporter: Peter Wicks
>            Assignee: Peter Wicks
>            Priority: Minor
>
> When using GenerateTableFetch it places no right hand boundary on pages of data.  This can lead to issues when the statement says to get the next 1000 records greater then a specific key, but records were added to the table between the time the processor executed and when the SQL is being executed. As a result it pulls in records that did not exist when the processor was run.  On the next execution of the processor these records will be pulled in a second time.
> Example:
> Partition Size = 1000
> First run (no state): Count(*)=4700 and MAX(ID)=4700.
> 5 FlowFiles are generated, the last one will say to fetch 1000, not 700. (But I don't think this is really a bug, just an observation).
> 5 Flow Files are now in queue to be executed by ExecuteSQL.  Before the 5th file can execute 400 new rows are added to the table.  When the final SQL statement is executed 300 extra records, with higher ID values, will also be pulled into NiFi.
> Second run (state: ID=4700).  Count(*) ID>4700 = 400 and MAX(ID)=5100.
> 1 Flow File is generated, but includes 300 records already pulled into NiFI.
> The solution is to have an optional property that will let users use the new MAX(ID) as a right boundary when generating queries.


--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)