Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE48200B81 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 23:26:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 5E79C160AD2; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 21:26:57 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E2B1160AAA for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 23:26:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 26021 invoked by uid 500); 13 Sep 2016 21:26:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@nifi.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@nifi.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@nifi.apache.org Received: (qmail 26008 invoked by uid 99); 13 Sep 2016 21:26:55 -0000 Received: from git1-us-west.apache.org (HELO git1-us-west.apache.org) (140.211.11.23) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 21:26:55 +0000 Received: by git1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at git1-us-west.apache.org, from userid 33) id AD603E00D6; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 21:26:55 +0000 (UTC) From: alopresto To: issues@nifi.apache.org Reply-To: issues@nifi.apache.org References: In-Reply-To: Subject: [GitHub] nifi issue #999: NIFI-2266 Enabled TLSv1.1 and TLSv1.2 protocols for GetHTTP... Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20160913212655.AD603E00D6@git1-us-west.apache.org> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 21:26:55 +0000 (UTC) archived-at: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 21:26:57 -0000 Github user alopresto commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/999 And, of course, as soon as I comment, it hits me -- `GetHTTP`, unlike `PostHTTP`, does not require a flowfile input in order to execute. So when I copied the tests I had written for `PostHTTP`, I needed to either remove the `enqueue` action of the message content prior to running, or assert that 2 flowfiles succeeded (the one manually enqueued and the result of the `GET` call). I think the current code is correct and successful, but if desired, I can push my latest changes which remove the manual enqueuing and assert explicitly 1 flowfile succeeded. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---