From dev-return-21990-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@netbeans.apache.org Tue Jun 8 21:05:52 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mxout1-ec2-va.apache.org (mxout1-ec2-va.apache.org [3.227.148.255]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D31E18060E for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 23:05:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.apache.org (mailroute1-lw-us.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mxout1-ec2-va.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mxout1-ec2-va.apache.org) with SMTP id 92A2040513 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 21:05:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29887 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2021 21:05:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@netbeans.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@netbeans.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@netbeans.apache.org Received: (qmail 29875 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2021 21:05:51 -0000 Received: from ec2-52-204-25-47.compute-1.amazonaws.com (HELO mailrelay1-ec2-va.apache.org) (52.204.25.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 21:05:51 +0000 Received: from mail-ej1-f44.google.com (mail-ej1-f44.google.com [209.85.218.44]) by mailrelay1-ec2-va.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-ec2-va.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 2377B3E8F4 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 21:05:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ej1-f44.google.com with SMTP id my49so18183672ejc.7 for ; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 14:05:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ttRiXFS2eubD00UX3M7kE9VdUWHHyx9JdyOLCiWX83UwlvtTh 0AiEbcuZPPUo1jz5v2IhUAVxsSCzZtGpRUTEa9a8lA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxW1uJIfUrDWYJ4Jn2xBz1tpAkKhSiQNOghgvcc+/7I3iXOPnrw6ps6IaXmuqt0LUeIbQ/WoyM/Me841HVhGD8= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7b97:: with SMTP id ne23mr25245248ejc.499.1623186350162; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 14:05:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Neil C Smith Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 22:05:45 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: OpenJDK Quality Outreach To: dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ce5a5605c447859c" --000000000000ce5a5605c447859c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 8 Jun 2021, 18:02 Geertjan Wielenga, wrote: > JEP 411 explicitly mentions NetBeans as one of the projects making use of > the SecurityManager. > IIRC that was added in later? > > So, they knew, all along, of course, but just not the extent to which we= =E2=80=99d > fight for it. Well, as someone who thinks JEP 411 is (probably) a good move, and the extent it's being fought might be an overreaction, a measured look at what can and can't be compatibly replaced with other mechanisms might also be constructive? Best wishes, Neil --000000000000ce5a5605c447859c--