From dev-return-3398-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@madlib.apache.org Fri Jun 15 20:50:06 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id B6E95180789 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 20:50:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 84477 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2018 18:50:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@madlib.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@madlib.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@madlib.apache.org Received: (qmail 83505 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2018 18:50:04 -0000 Received: from git1-us-west.apache.org (HELO git1-us-west.apache.org) (140.211.11.23) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 18:50:04 +0000 Received: by git1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at git1-us-west.apache.org, from userid 33) id 0D579E110D; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 18:50:04 +0000 (UTC) From: njayaram2 To: dev@madlib.apache.org Reply-To: dev@madlib.apache.org References: In-Reply-To: Subject: [GitHub] madlib issue #276: Feature/dev check Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20180615185004.0D579E110D@git1-us-west.apache.org> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 18:50:04 +0000 (UTC) Github user njayaram2 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/madlib/pull/276 Thank you for the comments @iyerr3 , will make the changes you have requested. Having one IC file for each module makes sense, but on Greenplum, for some modules the IC run time is still quite high. For example, if a module had 5 IC files, where each ran for 10 seconds, the user would see IC progressing every 10 seconds. But if those were combined into one IC file, the progression would happen after 50 seconds. It seemed a little odd (longer IC run times for some modules in terms of user experience) when we were trying it out, so decided to keep multiple IC files for such modules. ---