Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-lucene-net-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 36870 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2010 09:33:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Nov 2010 09:33:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 66581 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2010 09:34:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-lucene-net-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 66066 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2010 09:34:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-net-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 66041 invoked by uid 99); 11 Nov 2010 09:33:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 09:33:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of thoward37@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 09:33:55 +0000 Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so1799974bwz.35 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 01:33:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=7JdjZLhueN8Vgk5uvjjLAEcdXnffIvmoCc5zZTmWb3k=; b=iUttQhCcDpp80y1iyImNh4QUg8oVBER++VXMtWLppHvibw8G+NMEg6FI9iUdU+QJKm YbEi6uHukHZ7jp64Zr9GuI++QL10m0uSmnYYjrX4EB7wivKTF9rTLuFxEfSNn5cEEGOe r/pp8qdRVtcUwEZEd1SIyGxG+ze5KthMVJv5c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=WToPzreyx+THasU8ymlFlyKifSIQId8z/tqYC6jW2CfMSgzxDt/WXItITUAKPp31xS rsiWuU3usNbs7EIVSruIAQ6wOq3N6kUVD2qRthiVyQSHUJ7hkgPfiDCZfM3jw7Pf5kjW DZcbxV8PKs2wRr67WYPz0TyucCd4t9S9a0Si8= Received: by 10.204.57.13 with SMTP id a13mr940236bkh.180.1289468013077; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 01:33:33 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.6.219 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 01:33:12 -0800 (PST) From: Troy Howard Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 01:33:12 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Lucere project announcement To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org, lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 All, The recent discussions on this mailing list have shown a few things to be true: - Lucene.Net is definitely still a thriving project with strong leadership represented by George and DIGY - The community surrounding the project is vocal, vibrant and filled with ideas and motivation to help - There is a strong interest in seeing Lucene.Net continue as a line-by-line port of Java Lucene: - It's faster and more manageable to make releases because code can be automatically converted - Retains all the excellence of the Java Lucene project - Provides end users with a wealth of existing knowledge and support surrounding the Java Lucene project - There is a strong interest in have a more ".Net style" port of Lucene - Many users feel using the Java-idiomatic API is unwieldy - There is a desire to see the code take advantage of valuable .Net framework features that do not exist in Java - Performance can be improve on the .NET runtime by refactoring I'm very glad to see George has picked up the ball to keep Lucene.Net going and applaud his commitment to keeping the project focused on it's stated goals: a line-by-line port of Java Lucene that releases in sync the main project. I'm also glad to see that a number of people have started contributing in meaningful ways to the Lucene.Net project, working through the action list George posted a few days ago. I would like to optimistically think that crisis is well on it's way to being averted. I think this is a good sign that Lucene.Net will remain a vital and active project as part of the ASF. With that said, I'd like to announce Lucere, a new Lucene-based .NET project. The goal of Lucere is to create a "conceptual port" of Lucene for .NET as contrasted with the current "syntactic port" approach taken by Lucene.Net. We will start by creating a ground-up re-write of the current feature set of Java Lucene 3.0.2 that is optimized for .NET. This is a non-trivial task and may cause our initial release cycle to be slow. Beyond that we will be spending a certain amount of time upfront to design the API and architecture. While building our initial architecture and design we want to take into consideration the many different ideas that our community has to offer, producing what will hopefully be a full featured, flexible library that integrates well into a variety of kinds of applications. For more information, please see the project site at: http://lucere.codeplex.com We hope that the next few weeks will represent a lively discussion from members of the Lucene.Net community about the idea of a new project, our goals and the design and architecture of Lucere. In order to keep discussion focused for both projects, please consider joining the Lucere mailing list by sending a quick email to: lucere+subscribe@googlegroups.com Or, if you'd rather not use email, feel free to visit the discussion forums on the project site at: http://lucere.codeplex.com/discussions Hopefully there's enough interest in both concepts such that both projects may continue to move forward and thrive. We fully intend to have our cake and eat it too. :) Thanks, Troy