lucene-pylucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alexander Yaworsky <alexander.yawor...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [POLL] What should happen to PyLucene now?
Date Fri, 01 Jul 2016 16:35:43 GMT
Well, this bothered me (not a dev but fixed some of your bugs locally
long long ago, why didn't send patches is another story). Here's my
opinion, as a user. 1. Be in sync with lucene is a must. 2. Be in sync
with python is a must. Therefore,

> Question: What should happen to PyLucene now?
>
> [ ]  I’m happy with the last 4.x release, no need for new releases
> [ ]  Please, a new 6.x release (but I can’t contribute)
> [ ]  I’ll help make a new release happen, if I get some help!
> [X]  Only care about the JCC part
> [X]  Close down the sub project -- IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO MAINTAIN
> [ ]  Don’t care. I’m no longer a user
> [X]  Other: Move JCC to P3

Actually, the brilliant part of this project is JCC. In a company I
work for we still use it to utilize Java libraries from python. This
is the fastest solution and this sub-project must exist separately
imo. We do not use Lucene since 00's btw.

Thanks.

Alexander.

Mime
View raw message