Mailing-List: contact pylucene-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: pylucene-dev@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of adil.lotia@gmail.com designates
 209.85.216.169 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        b=CTHQP4C295yaQMMV6pvO7mE8lC8TJjEgoUKGVb+cGrSpK/nuvTxpGnSbkkknfl6PAn
         J4rn4+g47o4/o4uokKQO79Xu9AcZGfMvXFB6Psfp2kTF2lA7L5lC5Ft5BKZuOvhmdefV
         oDMDat+RwRJ/csdYQL+Nw0BrLGxE0xwoo7FJM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.01.1012091349480.91554@yuzu.local>
References: <alpine.OSX.2.01.1012042228030.86199@yuzu.local>
 <AANLkTimK6F+0GBjrBjXOYTisda7ig+SkPsVTRd-zXZuH@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.OSX.2.01.1012071326340.88533@yuzu.local>
 <alpine.OSX.2.01.1012091349480.91554@yuzu.local>
From: Adil Lotia <adil.lotia@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:58:44 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=1ck42YF=MM4_tEM6wj26CF5j3urB_aAA2nTN-@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.4-1 and 3.0.3-1
To: pylucene-dev@lucene.apache.org, Andi Vajda <vajda@apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163646d6a49d23680497015821

--00163646d6a49d23680497015821
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Wonderful!

Thank you for the quick review and fix on that one.

Cheers,
-Adil

On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Andi Vajda <vajda@apache.org> wrote:

>
> On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, Andi Vajda wrote:
>
>
>> Hi Adil,
>>
>>  And for both pylucene-3.0.3-1 (rc) and pylucene-3.0.2-1 when I run the
>>> make
>>> tests, most of the tests run fine, but a couple of them crash Python.
>>> ...
>>> /opt/local/bin/python test/test_PhraseQuery.py
>>> ........
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Ran 8 tests in 0.162s
>>>
>>> OK
>>> /opt/local/bin/python test/test_PositionIncrement.py
>>> Invalid memory access of location 0x0 eip=0x240ba3b
>>> make: *** [test] Error 1
>>>
>>> I have tested this on three of our 10.5 systems, and it is reproduceable
>>> on
>>> all. (The unit tests complete okay on 10.6). I have tried switching to
>>> Java
>>> 6 and/or Python 2.7, and I still get the same behaviour.  This crash is
>>> not
>>> a show-stopper for us. Pylucene is working fine for what we need.
>>>
>>
>> Hmm, let me try this on my 10.5 system and report back.
>> If someone else can try this before I get to it, please us know what you
>> see.
>>
>
> There was indeed a bug with using Java 1.5 where the JNI version was still
> 1.4. This caused some cached methods to be NULL instead of correct pointers.
>
> I fixed this on JCC's trunk (also used by the release candidates) and I
> should be preparing new release artifacts shortly.
>
> Andi..
>

--00163646d6a49d23680497015821--