Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-pylucene-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70181 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2010 21:34:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 Dec 2010 21:34:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 37588 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2010 21:34:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-pylucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 37571 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2010 21:34:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact pylucene-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: pylucene-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list pylucene-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 37563 invoked by uid 99); 10 Dec 2010 21:34:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 21:34:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of janssen@parc.com designates 13.1.64.93 as permitted sender) Received: from [13.1.64.93] (HELO alpha.xerox.com) (13.1.64.93) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 21:34:10 +0000 Received: from parc.com ([13.1.102.103]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <153914(1)>; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:33:38 PST To: pylucene-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.4-1 and 3.0.3-1 (take 2) In-reply-to: <4EA2A7CD-026E-4009-A510-33B6B6B3D139@apache.org> References: <3434.1292005471@parc.com> <4EA2A7CD-026E-4009-A510-33B6B6B3D139@apache.org> Comments: In-reply-to Andi Vajda message dated "Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:11:56 -0800." Cc: janssen@parc.com X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3; GNU Emacs 23.1.90 Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:33:38 PST Message-ID: <9403.1292016818@parc.com> From: Bill Janssen Andi Vajda wrote: > So, it's "broken on 10.6 out of the box" vs "broken on 10.5 out of the > box" or am I missing something else here ? (1) The patch I sent should work on both, out of the box. (2) Alternatively, if you hard-code the path as recommended by Mike Swingler, that should work on both (possibly requiring the additional download of a developer package for the headers -- but that's just part of installing the Java developer tools). Bill