From dev-return-367293-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@lucene.apache.org Thu Oct 10 09:46:12 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id D6DC0180626 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:46:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 6501 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2019 09:46:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 6488 invoked by uid 99); 10 Oct 2019 09:46:09 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 09:46:09 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 49FC9C2270 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 09:46:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-he-de.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E0TnDrdgBTQW for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 09:46:07 +0000 (UTC) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::22b; helo=mail-lj1-x22b.google.com; envelope-from=iverase@gmail.com; receiver= Received: from mail-lj1-x22b.google.com (mail-lj1-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22b]) by mx1-he-de.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-he-de.apache.org) with ESMTPS id B71D97DD89 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 09:46:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id d1so5460536ljl.13 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 02:46:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GlbeUufp5dAZFAk/BGd3aVGg7gB8KN6sQsp/fzfKI4s=; b=k6KRFuQeaQlP+S0AXPJLBPjxFE7GyRpqhLY1UpZBv8ayqP1dE5IbCFuHezmSW77wVm fd/uwMahhGY134aKiYef4sLcO23DF4HibhAEbCYFfXemtbTBue9zTNB83RVjKX27Ct0X niSfP21j5Lusnz7PZCsR5KBW81H1O2BCybUVZal9GYeLGBbrRzQkzoJT14VBNMZr9o4J wsdeYiWH8heJm8ym/JNB4pN1IJ4nXTgwABSUOBkqU+XpAwXgH8cSn2y7kOo5HFJm8lPl KuV+OmvYDXkiYD3ihuOYzFXQenaGqxVo5qN5Ey7i17B/VvrLEVmp123CGZJiXg+8TbYr Tt6Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GlbeUufp5dAZFAk/BGd3aVGg7gB8KN6sQsp/fzfKI4s=; b=RQNE5qvpMSaJ/o3idiLwAMLkWGySj/HX7uv/Q9PmbdpBfW72ROQ8zYYR6qi7eDHgS3 mwfbHsz3Ny+FPYNSY+ow4EBXxKt3VPZyObI9ISxbyvIhxybMgXsuBlIbAWCfjSeEmMr8 lumgRX1d92Mg8dwxEbrpxcwm3XdMnfLnH9YJdYEFDwmkHWc8E4K3iP6c1LEpTV8eCEBI 53QFRR9OIF56zXCe5e9+S0KgX32l1Aez4PuJxkrUJiBwn+H1GhT//Bri6G2Rao6nbYJ0 w+MuzXO+r/Jp0WmWaF8KGBIlnJ83akf9jf3YY9Fqw6JZcDAtsHyDoXeVh36qQebUMfrF KGNA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU4rXonUko0lgWZNlUCNpnDmHAbbnzvX3bqzgZdp6ValShodU2r 10XBso9HEdZmpEJBpiUodYryucXh81Q97en6yxRb0lchfeU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyKJadCpAiJnY01w6hy7O5O1soN4I74hZht0Dm7huBFM+CEKkq5j1+31062FD560p1T/GqV1v2yd5FJk2C0g90= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9205:: with SMTP id k5mr5772687ljg.172.1570700765617; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 02:46:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <49f8e1aa-e563-457e-b548-92970598b201@Spark> <006901d57de7$74810eb0$5d832c10$@thetaphi.de> <006c01d57de9$602224c0$20666e40$@thetaphi.de> <78BBDF70-1749-4A6F-8029-BAA3C02B5D67@getopt.org> <94EDAE0C-95D9-45DB-8DBE-1A0F235736D0@thetaphi.de> In-Reply-To: <94EDAE0C-95D9-45DB-8DBE-1A0F235736D0@thetaphi.de> From: Ignacio Vera Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:45:53 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 8.3 release To: dev@lucene.apache.org Cc: Ishan Chattopadhyaya Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002ee1e305948b4559" --0000000000002ee1e305948b4559 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ishan, Thanks for taking care of the release. We have a blocker in Lucene (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8920). I remember that was an issue for the 8.2.0 release and it was reverted and naked as a blocker for this release. Maybe we should completely reverted until we have a better solution? let see what Mike thinks about it. Thanks, Ignacio On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 4:51 PM Uwe Schindler wrote: > Hi, > > I also had a customer complaining about this. I have the feeling it also > happens from time to time during inter node comm, which uses solrj, too. > > Uwe > > Am October 9, 2019 1:38:00 PM UTC schrieb Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com>: >> >> +1, Dat! Please go ahead. >> >> On Wed, 9 Oct, 2019, 2:33 PM Andrzej Bia=C5=82ecki, wrot= e: >> >>> It=E2=80=99s marked as Minor in Jira, but after reading the description= it >>> sounds scary - IMHO it should be at least well investigated before 8.3 = in >>> order to determine whether it causes real damage (apart from looking sc= ary >>> and filling the logs). >>> >>> +1 from me. >>> >>> On 9 Oct 2019, at 10:48, =C4=90=E1=BA=A1t Cao M=E1=BA=A1nh wrote: >>> >>> Hi Ishan, guys >>> >>> I want to include the fix for >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13293 in this release. >>> Hoping that is ok! >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:02 PM Uwe Schindler wrote: >>> >>>> ASF Jenkins Jobs also reconfigured. >>>> >>>> I left the 8.2 Refguide job in the queue (I cloned it), not sure if >>>> that one is still needed. All other jobs are 8.3 now. >>>> >>>> Uwe >>>> >>>> ----- >>>> Uwe Schindler >>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >>>> https://www.thetaphi.de >>>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de >>>> >>>> > -----Original Message----- >>>> > From: Uwe Schindler >>>> > Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2019 4:49 PM >>>> > To: dev@lucene.apache.org >>>> > Subject: RE: 8.3 release >>>> > >>>> > Policeman Jenkins builds and tests 8.3 for Windows and Linux. >>>> > >>>> > Uwe >>>> > >>>> > ----- >>>> > Uwe Schindler >>>> > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >>>> > https://www.thetaphi.de >>>> > eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de >>>> > >>>> > > -----Original Message----- >>>> > > From: Ishan Chattopadhyaya >>>> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2019 4:32 PM >>>> > > To: Lucene Dev ; Uwe Schindler >>>> > > ; Steve Rowe >>>> > > Subject: Re: 8.3 release >>>> > > >>>> > > I've cut the 8.3 branch. Please feel free to push in any bug fix. >>>> For >>>> > > any feature, please let me know to see how we can accommodate it >>>> > > safely. >>>> > > I'm planning to get myself familiarized with what I need to do for >>>> the >>>> > > ref guide release (simultaneously with the binary release). So, mo= st >>>> > > likely, I'll be able to build artifacts in another week's time. >>>> > > @Uwe Schindler / @Steve Rowe would it be possible to please creat= e >>>> a >>>> > > Jenkins branch for 8.3? >>>> > > Thanks, >>>> > > Ishan >>>> > > >>>> > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 4:17 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya >>>> > > wrote: >>>> > > > >>>> > > > I'll cut the branch in 12-24 hours from now. If someone has >>>> anything >>>> > > > to put into branch_8x now, please feel free. >>>> > > > If someone has a non-bugfix issue that they want to push in to 8= .3 >>>> > > > after the branch cut, but you're sure it will not disrupt the >>>> > > > stability of the release, please let me know and we can discuss >>>> on a >>>> > > > case-by-case basis. >>>> > > > >>>> > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 8:50 PM Mikhail Khludnev >>>> > > wrote: >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > Excuse me. I have to recall this message regarding SOLR-13764. >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 10:56 PM Mikhail Khludnev >>>> > > wrote: >>>> > > > >> >>>> > > > >> Ishan, thanks for update. >>>> > > > >> May I propose to hold it for this week, beside of the severe >>>> issues you >>>> > > mentioned, I'd like to drop pretty neat JSON Query parser for >>>> Interval >>>> > > Queries https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13764 this week= . >>>> > > > >> >>>> > > > >> =D0=BF=D0=BD, 30 =D1=81=D0=B5=D0=BD=D1=82. 2019 =D0=B3., 18:0= 4 Ishan Chattopadhyaya >>>> > > : >>>> > > > >>> >>>> > > > >>> * Due to some unfinished and half merged work in SOLR-13661, >>>> we >>>> > are >>>> > > in >>>> > > > >>> a difficult position for a branch cutting today (as I had >>>> proposed). >>>> > > > >>> I have documented the options on how to deal with that >>>> immediately >>>> > > in >>>> > > > >>> that issue. I'll work to resolve the situation and cut a >>>> branch as >>>> > > > >>> soon as possible. >>>> > > > >>> * SOLR-13677 is also a blocker for release, but I can procee= d >>>> with the >>>> > > > >>> branch cutting. >>>> > > > >>> >>>> > > > >>> I'll take a look at the ref guide's simultaneous release as >>>> we reach >>>> > > > >>> closer to building the artifacts. >>>> > > > >>> Thanks, >>>> > > > >>> Ishan >>>> > > > >>> >>>> > > > >>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 9:06 PM Cassandra Targett >>>> > > wrote: >>>> > > > >>> > >>>> > > > >>> > As I=E2=80=99ve mentioned to some of you over the past cou= ple of >>>> weeks, I >>>> > > want to propose that we don=E2=80=99t =E2=80=9Crelease=E2=80=9D th= e Ref Guide at all the >>>> way we >>>> > have >>>> > > been doing it. >>>> > > > >>> > >>>> > > > >>> > It deserves a separate thread, which since it=E2=80=99s co= me up a >>>> few times >>>> > > this week I should start now, but in essence, my idea is to no >>>> longer treat >>>> > the >>>> > > PDF as a release artifact that requires a vote, and publish the >>>> HTML as our >>>> > > primary version of the Ref Guide in effectively the same way we >>>> publish the >>>> > > javadocs (at the same time as the binary artifacts). >>>> > > > >>> > >>>> > > > >>> > Instead of highjacking this thread with that discussion >>>> since it has >>>> > > several aspects, let me send another mail on it where I can flesh >>>> it out >>>> > more >>>> > > and we can discuss there. I have the mail mostly queued up and >>>> ready to >>>> > go >>>> > > already. >>>> > > > >>> > >>>> > > > >>> > Cassandra >>>> > > > >>> > On Sep 18, 2019, 10:23 AM -0500, Gus Heck >>>> > , >>>> > > wrote: >>>> > > > >>> > >>>> > > > >>> > I learned recently that it's actually all documented here= : >>>> > > >>>> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_1/how-to-contribute.html#ref- >>>> > > guide-publication-process >>>> > > > >>> > >>>> > > > >>> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 7:31 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya >>>> > > wrote: >>>> > > > >>> >> >>>> > > > >>> >> Hi Adrien, >>>> > > > >>> >> Indeed, meant to write about starting a vote. >>>> > > > >>> >> >>>> > > > >>> >> @Gus, I'll have to let Cassandra weigh in on this one as >>>> I'm not >>>> > very >>>> > > familiar with the ref guide release process. >>>> > > > >>> >> >>>> > > > >>> >> Regards, >>>> > > > >>> >> Ishan >>>> > > > >>> >> >>>> > > > >>> >> On Mon, 16 Sep, 2019, 7:28 PM Adrien Grand, >>>> > > wrote: >>>> > > > >>> >>> >>>> > > > >>> >>> +1 to start working on 8.3 >>>> > > > >>> >>> >>>> > > > >>> >>> Did you mean "start a vote" when you wrote "release the >>>> > > artifacts"? It >>>> > > > >>> >>> got me wondering because I don't think we frequently >>>> managed >>>> > to >>>> > > go >>>> > > > >>> >>> from cutting a branch to releasing artifacts in so littl= e >>>> time in the >>>> > > > >>> >>> past. >>>> > > > >>> >>> >>>> > > > >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 5:52 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya >>>> > > > >>> >>> wrote: >>>> > > > >>> >>> > >>>> > > > >>> >>> > Hi all, >>>> > > > >>> >>> > We have a lot of unreleased features and fixes. I >>>> propose that >>>> > we >>>> > > cut >>>> > > > >>> >>> > a 8.3 branch in two weeks (in order to have sufficient >>>> time to >>>> > > bake in >>>> > > > >>> >>> > all in-progress features). If there are no objections >>>> to doing so, I >>>> > > > >>> >>> > can volunteer for the release as an RM and plan for >>>> cutting a >>>> > > release >>>> > > > >>> >>> > branch on 30 September (and release the artifacts abou= t >>>> 3-4 >>>> > days >>>> > > after >>>> > > > >>> >>> > that). >>>> > > > >>> >>> > >>>> > > > >>> >>> > WDYT? >>>> > > > >>> >>> > Regards, >>>> > > > >>> >>> > Ishan >>>> > > > >>> >>> > >>>> > > > >>> >>> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> > > > >>> >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>>> dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org >>>> > > > >>> >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: >>>> dev-help@lucene.apache.org >>>> > > > >>> >>> > >>>> > > > >>> >>> >>>> > > > >>> >>> >>>> > > > >>> >>> -- >>>> > > > >>> >>> Adrien >>>> > > > >>> >>> >>>> > > > >>> >>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> > > > >>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.or= g >>>> > > > >>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>>> dev-help@lucene.apache.org >>>> > > > >>> >>> >>>> > > > >>> > >>>> > > > >>> > >>>> > > > >>> > -- >>>> > > > >>> > http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >>>> > > > >>> > http://www.the111shift.com (play) >>>> > > > >>> >>>> > > > >>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> > > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org >>>> > > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org >>>> > > > >>> >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > -- >>>> > > > > Sincerely yours >>>> > > > > Mikhail Khludnev >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org >>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------= - >>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org >>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> *Best regards,* >>> *Cao M=E1=BA=A1nh =C4=90=E1=BA=A1t* >>> *E-mail: caomanhdat317@gmail.com * >>> >>> >>> > -- > Uwe Schindler > Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen > https://www.thetaphi.de > --0000000000002ee1e305948b4559 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Ishan,

=
Thanks for taking care of the release. We have a blocker in Lucene (se= e https://iss= ues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8920). I remember=C2=A0that was an is= sue for the 8.2.0 release and it was reverted and naked=C2=A0as a blocker f= or this release. Maybe we should completely=C2=A0reverted until we have a b= etter solution? let see what Mike thinks about it.

Thanks,

Ignacio

On Wed, Oct 9, 2= 019 at 4:51 PM Uwe Schindler <uwe@the= taphi.de> wrote:
Hi,

I also ha= d a customer complaining about this. I have the feeling it also happens fro= m time to time during inter node comm, which uses solrj, too.

Uwe
Am October 9, 2019 1:38:00 PM UTC schrieb I= shan Chattopadhyaya <ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com>:
+1, Dat! Please go ahead.

On Wed, 9 Oct, 2019, 2:33 PM And= rzej Bia=C5=82ecki, <= ab@getopt.org> wrote:
It=E2=80=99s marked as Minor i= n Jira, but after reading the description it sounds scary - IMHO it should = be at least well investigated before 8.3 in order to determine whether it c= auses real damage (apart from looking scary and filling the logs).

=
+1 from me.

On 9 Oct = 2019, at 10:48, =C4=90=E1=BA=A1t Cao M=E1=BA=A1nh <caomanhdat317@gm= ail.com> wrote:

Hi I= shan, guys

I want to include the fix for=C2=A0https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13293 in this r= elease. Hoping that is ok!

Thanks!

On T= ue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:02 PM Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de> wrote:
ASF Jenkins Jobs also reconfigured.

I left the 8.2 Refguide job in the queue (I cloned it), not sure if that on= e is still needed. All other jobs are 8.3 now.

Uwe

-----
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
https://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2019 4:49 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: 8.3 release
>
> Policeman Jenkins builds and tests 8.3 for Windows and Linux.
>
> Uwe
>
> -----
> Uwe Schindler
> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> https://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ishan Chattopadhyaya <ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2019 4:32 PM
> > To: Lucene Dev <dev@lucene.apache.org>; Uwe Schind= ler
> > <uschindler@apache.org>; Steve Rowe <sarowe@gmail.c= om>
> > Subject: Re: 8.3 release
> >
> > I've cut the 8.3 branch. Please feel free to push in any bug = fix. For
> > any feature, please let me know to see how we can accommodate it<= br> > > safely.
> > I'm planning to get myself familiarized with what I need to d= o for the
> > ref guide release (simultaneously with the binary release). So, m= ost
> > likely, I'll be able to build artifacts in another week's= time.
> > @Uwe Schindler / @Steve Rowe=C2=A0 would it be possible to please= create a
> > Jenkins branch for 8.3?
> > Thanks,
> > Ishan
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 4:17 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> > <ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'll cut the branch in 12-24 hours from now. If someone = has anything
> > > to put into branch_8x now, please feel free.
> > > If someone has a non-bugfix issue that they want to push in = to 8.3
> > > after the branch cut, but you're sure it will not disrup= t the
> > > stability of the release, please let me know and we can disc= uss on a
> > > case-by-case basis.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 8:50 PM Mikhail Khludnev <mkhl@apach= e.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Excuse me. I have to recall this message regarding SOLR= -13764.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 10:56 PM Mikhail Khludnev
> > <ggedel@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Ishan, thanks for update.
> > > >> May I propose to hold it for this week, beside of t= he severe issues you
> > mentioned, I'd like to drop pretty neat JSON Query parser for= Interval
> > Queries https://issues.apache.o= rg/jira/browse/SOLR-13764 this week.
> > > >>
> > > >> =D0=BF=D0=BD, 30 =D1=81=D0=B5=D0=BD=D1=82. 2019 =D0= =B3., 18:04 Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> > <ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com>:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> * Due to some unfinished and half merged work i= n SOLR-13661, we
> are
> > in
> > > >>> a difficult position for a branch cutting today= (as I had proposed).
> > > >>> I have documented the options on how to deal wi= th that immediately
> > in
> > > >>> that issue. I'll work to resolve the situat= ion and cut a branch as
> > > >>> soon as possible.
> > > >>> * SOLR-13677 is also a blocker for release, but= I can proceed with the
> > > >>> branch cutting.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I'll take a look at the ref guide's sim= ultaneous release as we reach
> > > >>> closer to building the artifacts.
> > > >>> Thanks,
> > > >>> Ishan
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 9:06 PM Cassandra Targe= tt
> > <casstargett@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > As I=E2=80=99ve mentioned to some of you o= ver the past couple of weeks, I
> > want to propose that we don=E2=80=99t =E2=80=9Crelease=E2=80=9D t= he Ref Guide at all the way we
> have
> > been doing it.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > It deserves a separate thread, which since= it=E2=80=99s come up a few times
> > this week I should start now, but in essence, my idea is to no lo= nger treat
> the
> > PDF as a release artifact that requires a vote, and publish the H= TML as our
> > primary version of the Ref Guide in effectively the same way we p= ublish the
> > javadocs (at the same time as the binary artifacts).
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > Instead of highjacking this thread with th= at discussion since it has
> > several aspects, let me send another mail on it where I can flesh= it out
> more
> > and we can discuss there. I have the mail mostly queued up and re= ady to
> go
> > already.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > Cassandra
> > > >>> > On Sep 18, 2019, 10:23 AM -0500, Gus Heck<= br> > <gus.heck@gmail.com>,
> > wrote:
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > I learned recently that it's actually = all=C2=A0 documented here:
> > https://luc= ene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_1/how-to-contribute.html#ref-
> > guide-publication-process
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 7:31 PM Ishan Chat= topadhyaya
> > <ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>> >>
> > > >>> >> Hi Adrien,
> > > >>> >> Indeed, meant to write about starting = a vote.
> > > >>> >>
> > > >>> >> @Gus, I'll have to let Cassandra w= eigh in on this one as I'm not
> very
> > familiar with the ref guide release process.
> > > >>> >>
> > > >>> >> Regards,
> > > >>> >> Ishan
> > > >>> >>
> > > >>> >> On Mon, 16 Sep, 2019, 7:28 PM Adrien G= rand,
> > <jpountz@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>> +1 to start working on 8.3
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>> Did you mean "start a vote&qu= ot; when you wrote "release the
> > artifacts"? It
> > > >>> >>> got me wondering because I don'= ;t think we frequently managed
> to
> > go
> > > >>> >>> from cutting a branch to releasing= artifacts in so little time in the
> > > >>> >>> past.
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 5:52 PM Is= han Chattopadhyaya
> > > >>> >>> <ichattopadhyaya@gmail.c= om> wrote:
> > > >>> >>> >
> > > >>> >>> > Hi all,
> > > >>> >>> > We have a lot of unreleased f= eatures and fixes. I propose that
> we
> > cut
> > > >>> >>> > a 8.3 branch in two weeks (in= order to have sufficient time to
> > bake in
> > > >>> >>> > all in-progress features). If= there are no objections to doing so, I
> > > >>> >>> > can volunteer for the release= as an RM and plan for cutting a
> > release
> > > >>> >>> > branch on 30 September (and r= elease the artifacts about 3-4
> days
> > after
> > > >>> >>> > that).
> > > >>> >>> >
> > > >>> >>> > WDYT?
> > > >>> >>> > Regards,
> > > >>> >>> > Ishan
> > > >>> >>> >
> > > >>> >>> > -----------------------------= ----------------------------------------
> > > >>> >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > > >>> >>> > For additional commands, e-ma= il: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > > >>> >>> >
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>> --
> > > >>> >>> Adrien
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >>> ----------------------------------= -----------------------------------
> > > >>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > > >>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: <= a href=3D"mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_= blank">dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > > >>> >>>
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > --
> > > >>> > http://www.needhamsoftwar= e.com (work)
> > > >>> > http://www.the111shift.com (play)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> -----------------------------------------------= ----------------------
> > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsu= bscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-he= lp@lucene.apache.org
> > > >>>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Sincerely yours
> > > > Mikhail Khludnev
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------= ----
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apa= che.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.o= rg
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------<= br> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.o= rg
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org



--
Best regards,
<= font>Cao M=E1=BA=A1nh = =C4=90=E1=BA=A1t


--
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremenhttps://www.thetaph= i.de
--0000000000002ee1e305948b4559--