Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 13939 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2010 23:47:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Jun 2010 23:47:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 1961 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2010 23:47:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 1860 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2010 23:47:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 1853 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2010 23:47:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 23:47:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rcmuir@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 23:47:03 +0000 Received: by vws1 with SMTP id 1so1205632vws.35 for ; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 16:46:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=APcZFZ0lNzD2eAlRZbgRkzLnt9H0q4DICoA9BfTQjuA=; b=ThfQFt3MfQJgtDWze7Z65n4iux+ywc1YYEhb7xi+jY380hMfx5mZS7/Xk8nvSW9Cct d3jgTk5PC9lqDLbyGqqsH08Ud6BNeQu0qntZJN+gH1967dWBLfzQlifEifepjRnn263C /16wErM+6zRshZ+z4uzaBpy18gcgpjry/+lbU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=Yx+3+gzbniSfG9/dPOKOLGhl66ng64dNNvG8HvcFUQ+KTQ0Ng1jgI5P3LaF92d1KEc XK3cCsdUquHct2JD3lHNK9njp15prKOH3O687E5x5P7Ns/JBbvot0pPoJ1EJF3xc0aTH cMLCQ/o8dqQ/CoJYrZEVAAX8OFU8L8k/C7KOY= Received: by 10.224.41.18 with SMTP id m18mr2889651qae.45.1275436002439; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 16:46:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.45.81 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 16:46:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Robert Muir Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 19:46:22 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Push for a Solr 1.4.1 Bug Fix Release? To: dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485e7c968dbf6ae04880095ca --001485e7c968dbf6ae04880095ca Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > > SOLR-1852: i never even noticed this issue to consider it because i was > only looking at things marked "Resolved" in the 1.5, 3.1, or 4.0 branch (i > was only looking for things we already had fixes for) and this issue is > still marked open ...looking at it now, am i correct in understanding that > it was fixed in 3.1/4.0 as a side effect of something else, and the patch > you posted is only needed/useful in 1.4? ... if so then let's definitley > get that in 1.4.1. > Yeah this was fixed for a while in trunk. I am only being a pain in the ass about it because Peter (the reporter) has been patiently waiting for some decision on what to do about it... I do think its sneaky, i mean stopword before punctuation is probably pretty common :) > > LUCENE-2466: didn't show up in my lists because it's a LUCENE issue ... > i'm a personally leary of merging this to include i na point release -- > One alternative instead of merging those fixes would be to document a recommendation to just use -D's from the jvm to ensure US locale, since we know others are problematic. -- Robert Muir rcmuir@gmail.com --001485e7c968dbf6ae04880095ca Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Chris Ho= stetter <h= ossman_lucene@fucit.org> wrote:


SOLR-1852: i never even noticed this issue to consider it because i was
only looking at things marked "Resolved" in the 1.5, 3.1, or 4.0 = branch (i
was only looking for things we already had fixes for) and this issue is
still marked open ...looking at it now, am i correct in understanding that<= br> it was fixed in 3.1/4.0 as a side effect of something else, and the patch you posted is only needed/useful in 1.4? ... if so then let's definitle= y
get that in 1.4.1.

Yeah this was fixed = for a while in trunk. I am only being a pain in the ass about it because Pe= ter (the reporter) has been patiently waiting for some decision on what to = do about it... I do think its sneaky, i mean stopword before punctuation is= probably pretty common :)
=C2=A0

LUCENE-2466: didn't show up in my lists because it's a LUCENE issue= ...
i'm a personally leary of merging this to include i na point release --=
=C2=A0
One alternative instead of merging t= hose fixes would be to document a recommendation to just use -D's from = the jvm to ensure US locale, since we know others are problematic.

--
Robert Muir
rcmuir@= gmail.com
--001485e7c968dbf6ae04880095ca--