Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01CE0200C31 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:52:13 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 0050B160B73; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:52:13 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B656160B83 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:52:12 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 33283 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2017 16:52:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact log4php-dev-help@logging.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: "Log4PHP Dev" List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list log4php-dev@logging.apache.org Received: (qmail 33139 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2017 16:52:10 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 16:52:10 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C01F41806A5; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:52:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.009 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.009 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7yNTCVtT-RsA; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:52:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.am-soft.de (mail.am-soft.de [83.218.36.120]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 1F8A15F27E; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:52:08 +0000 (UTC) Envelope-To: ralph.goers@dslextreme.com Envelope-To: log4cxx-dev@logging.apache.org Envelope-To: private@logging.apache.org Envelope-To: log4j-dev@logging.apache.org Envelope-To: general@logging.apache.org Envelope-To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org Envelope-To: log4php-dev@logging.apache.org Received: from tschoening-nb.fritz.box (dslb-088-072-096-139.088.072.pools.vodafone-ip.de [88.72.96.139]) by mail.am-soft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D141EECE8; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:52:01 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:52:03 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Thorsten_Sch=C3=B6ning?= Organization: AM-SoFT IT-Systeme Message-ID: <1264543853.20170308175203@am-soft.de> To: Apache , "Log4CXX Dev" , Logging PMC CC: Log4J Developers List , Logging General , Log4Net Developers List , log4php-dev@logging.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@ In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable archived-at: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 16:52:13 -0000 Guten Tag Apache, am Mittwoch, 8. M=C3=A4rz 2017 um 13:38 schrieben Sie: > The reason for doing this is a result of the last board meeting. > The PMC had to discuss something on the private mailing list simply > because PMC members don't subscribe to every list, nor do they want > to, so it was not possible to have the discussion on the correct mailing = list. -0 from me. You surely already discussed most/all pros and cons... So while I prefer the language based organization of the lists as well, I'm somewhat sure I can live with your suggestion if it makes life easier for others. Mit freundlichen Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fen, Thorsten Sch=C3=B6ning --=20 Thorsten Sch=C3=B6ning E-Mail: Thorsten.Schoening@AM-SoFT.de AM-SoFT IT-Systeme http://www.AM-SoFT.de/ Telefon...........05151- 9468- 55 Fax...............05151- 9468- 88 Mobil..............0178-8 9468- 04 AM-SoFT GmbH IT-Systeme, Brandenburger Str. 7c, 31789 Hameln AG Hannover HRB 207 694 - Gesch=C3=A4ftsf=C3=BChrer: Andreas Muchow