logging-log4php-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dominik Psenner <dpsen...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@
Date Thu, 09 Mar 2017 09:45:21 GMT
The votes are way too scattered over the different mailing lists so that 
I didn't even find my own vote. ;-) Therefore I'm trying to summarize 
the current state of the vote:

log4j-dev@, log4php-dev@, log4net-dev@, log4cxx-dev@ ->dev@logging.apache.org

Matt Sicker: +1
Ralph Goers: +1
Stefan Bodewig: +1
Sven Rautenverg: -1
Thorsten Schöning: -0
Ivan Habunek: -0
Dominik Psenner: +1
Remko Popma: +1
Mikael Ståldal: +0

Totals so far:
+1: 5
+0: 1
-0: 2
-1: 1

log4j-user@, log4php-user@, log4net-user@, log4cxx-user@, general@ ->user@logging.apache.org

Matt Sicker: -1
Ralph Goers: +1
Stefan Bodewig: -1
Sven Rautenverg: -1
Thorsten Schöning: -0
Ivan Habunek: -0
Dominik Psenner: +1
Remko Popma: +1
Mikael Ståldal: -1

Totals so far:
+1: 3
+0: 0
-0: 2
-1: 4

Sorry to anyone who's vote is missing.

On 2017-03-08 05:20, Matt Sicker wrote:
> I may be missing some mailing lists considering I just subscribed to 
> half of them less than five minutes ago.
>
> This is a vote to merge the various Apache Logging Services mailing 
> lists. The proposal is to combine them as follows:
>
> log4j-dev@, log4php-dev@, log4net-dev@, log4cxx-dev@ -> 
> dev@logging.apache.org <mailto:dev@logging.apache.org>
> log4j-user@, log4php-user@, log4net-user@, log4cxx-user@, general@ -> 
> user@logging.apache.org <mailto:user@logging.apache.org>
>
> commits@ and private@ remain the same as before.
>
> The proposal would also suggest that the old emails become aliases for 
> the combined email names so as not to lose any future emails. To 
> distinguish between projects, a subject tag can be added such as:
>
> [java]
> [net]
> [cxx]
> [php]
>
> Though I wouldn't think such a tag is required, though it should help 
> in gaining the attention of the appropriate audience.
>
> Voting:
>
> +1: Yes, combine the mailing lists!
> +0: Go ahead, don't care that much.
> -0: Don't like it, but not vetoing it.
> -1: No, don't do that! I have a better idea!
>
> This vote follows the same "lazy consensus" (at least 3 +1 binding, no 
> -1/vetoes) we use for general releases and whatnot. The vote will be 
> open for at least 72 hours.
>
> -- 
> Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com <mailto:boards@gmail.com>>


Mime
View raw message