Mailing-List: contact dev-help@kafka.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@kafka.apache.org
From: Matt Farmer <matt@frmr.me>
In-Reply-To: <72b72676-b2bf-28dd-fe4b-0d50b16dcecd@confluent.io>
References: <CAM5dya8q2uVUz1JiNrTgPqAS-7c4gxXjJQQJ4ZLR1Rq5UUeh+A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHwHRrU6hwaczmj=hm3_CHD_NenvDkqO7M1zci=4rdv73vxZEg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHwHRrVZtP5OMyae9d_1fmCQDTjijz85yWWa-L6jOT_5puUSWQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALte62zrByxxax+wCN0F8R69eqLs3B0e_mYcArOW7ohp2DO5sw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAM5dya-a1GEnJ336oqehO-VKF2=CWY=CuGBfn626Rp0MFZt34w@mail.gmail.com>
 <0a026907-8f97-ae10-35ea-5503737ac286@confluent.io> <CAJikTEX2nQ76cwu2gOs0195xNTE-FXogWAK-ZK-O74acNWwZLw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAM5dya_PQ6HJhqRaBUnQmqH9sYssx=TYrcEdWavJUqMbLstYEg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAF7WS+rTvXkaiHH4DeMbJdK+hH73RSKaLE6=EVDzNpjCSqKGSg@mail.gmail.com> <72b72676-b2bf-28dd-fe4b-0d50b16dcecd@confluent.io>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 10:42:50 -0800
Message-ID: <CAM5dya9k+JdGOAapec9BiztQPxyw_N7TgyzKNNsc4iwhgSarXg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-210: Provide for custom error handling when Kafka
 Streams fails to produce
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0823d888ab75ff05602904b5"
archived-at: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 18:42:58 -0000

--089e0823d888ab75ff05602904b5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Current tally here is 2 binding +1s, 4 non-binding +1s.

The remaining remarks on the PR seem to mostly be nits, so I feel like
we=E2=80=99ve converged a bit. If a committer could take a look and either =
leave me
some feedback on the discussion thread or give me a +1, I=E2=80=99d really
appreciate it. :)

Thanks!


On December 6, 2017 at 2:07:08 PM, Matthias J. Sax (matthias@confluent.io)
wrote:

+1


On 12/6/17 7:54 AM, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Matt Farmer <matt@frmr.me> wrote:
>
>> Bumping this thread so it=E2=80=99s visible given that the conversation =
on
KIP-210
>> has converged again.
>>
>> Current tally is 2 binding +1s, and 2 non-binding +1s.
>>
>> On November 8, 2017 at 12:26:32 PM, Damian Guy (damian.guy@gmail.com)
>> wrote:
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> On Sat, 4 Nov 2017 at 16:50 Matthias J. Sax <matthias@confluent.io>
wrote:
>>
>>> Yes. A KIP needs 3 binding "+1" to be accepted.
>>>
>>> You can still work on the PR and get it ready to get merged -- I am
>>> quite confident that this KIP will be accepted :)
>>>
>>>
>>> -Matthias
>>>
>>> On 11/4/17 3:56 PM, Matt Farmer wrote:
>>>> Bump! I believe I need two more binding +1's to proceed?
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 11:49 AM Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangguoz@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (binding) from me. Thanks!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangguoz@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The vote should stay open for at least 72 hours. The bylaws can be
>>>>> found
>>>>>>> here https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Bylaws
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Matt Farmer <matt@frmr.me> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It seems like discussion around KIP-210 has gone to a lull. I've
>> got
>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>> candidate work underway for it already, so I'd like to go ahead
and
>>>>> call
>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>> to a vote.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For reference, the KIP can be found here:
>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-210+-+
>>>>>>>>
>>> Provide+for+custom+error+handling++when+Kafka+Streams+fails+to+produce
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also, how long to vote threads stay open generally before changing
>>> the
>>>>>>>> status of the KIP?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> Matt
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> -- Guozhang
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> -- Guozhang
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

--089e0823d888ab75ff05602904b5--