Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4302200B22 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 12:17:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id D2C80160A46; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 10:17:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 2627B160A41 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 12:17:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 51353 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2016 10:17:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@kafka.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@kafka.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@kafka.apache.org Received: (qmail 51341 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2016 10:17:56 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 10:17:56 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 5AC49C082C for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 10:17:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.179 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.179 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx2-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zjVZh8NX7SIg for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 10:17:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lf0-f44.google.com (mail-lf0-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by mx2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 492F85F4EB for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 10:17:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f44.google.com with SMTP id b73so9482519lfb.3 for ; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 03:17:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=qWnjXnzYH2+M4MXBufYxTu9sapYjCfrA8rSPTeVV0gA=; b=FSPb1mhmTCxePd05NhU1QbYKCPl6bzP8kv/uSJ0qw66/FM0Md1W8FBH54UCaA0jPwN I/LAvZWmvAPjb6//+Bl9Dbbssyp8qRx7vDlCQWkYWzleatNLwY2BjmE4n6e2bZ7KsvBh qaQVN3/Um185PuE0ivAjhrqBalCHMsXdqdn59iptEnxY/ewTSAau04N2rE5tFSBxwUZq R3XpeK0uY+/Yvll8rCaCp2wymd+zSBXx5Hj5gO2NvZ95Ye5U+cgrPQlmrGEukJNdYZb9 YDWUNKi10cuXSyQVRvZ7cl0U0ixno6GIi7kuM8m09zZ8U62xMN56R/YVNx4NaVLQ05kc kKQw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=qWnjXnzYH2+M4MXBufYxTu9sapYjCfrA8rSPTeVV0gA=; b=Qtx6icbS+dq02f/iRdvC5uZLSyzneTKgjQDQPzNucX0Puo7bgPA2ZVpcadlkVwhRob 3/UTEhDFHT8aCZyKWTVMnPvPNKWOoCLWyBRGZ3qNYORNTlDCuL63l1/I5VgedAoYlAH1 VkcXsb+6TH4/OvIppVn5jmfCsHBngqWn1EFXbvFHw5vI7+3orZ/apXKvnFQcjrfRjY3U c+4OyJ4sVJ2FfFh2jCUBDl+Hv+HK9gIdalf0n21XTNgQBdLKxJkJSKy0vGxVk7751hp6 4QP7Cd/oRkjeMBns6ZRhRPeL4hSYWy+fJUVk8cHlypARl+xRV3bvvNrBxQoYzZhFT8Zu dukQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKAVR+AqNz7AUp8aho1Ca0YAAlTve6LxRmqpuc5RCpNNE76EOp2Ah7dGk1V/6Jh8leKGyfyGe/CHkxFfg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.216.27 with SMTP id p27mr1066132lfg.226.1464776273959; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 03:17:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.96.230 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 03:17:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 15:47:53 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Using zookeeper vs gossip protocols in Kafka From: Unmesh Joshi To: dev@kafka.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1141213a7c243e053434cd8d archived-at: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 10:17:59 -0000 --001a1141213a7c243e053434cd8d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, I see that Kafka uses zookeeper for group membership and leader election. Curious to know if Kafka developers ever discussed to move away from Zookeeper and use Gossip based protocols. Is there any specific advantage of using Zookeeper over Gossip based implementation or vice versa? Thanks, Unmesh --001a1141213a7c243e053434cd8d--