Mailing-List: contact dev-help@kafka.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@kafka.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAFc58G8W6pvGezXeJxBNft4=W18RHBTh8HN0a=nyedDJCCFROQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAJDuW=BoCOESP6XZ_cjNvrSmsWtH4XX3ohK5GJ2rPiqr2HOFQA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFc58G8W6pvGezXeJxBNft4=W18RHBTh8HN0a=nyedDJCCFROQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 09:43:34 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CAJDuW=Dp0p0vyY+efnhQ_e+UbR=xLNrdeS8Zt0yhuA_wGYEjAA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-41: Consumer Max Records
From: Jason Gustafson <jason@confluent.io>
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11410d689ec1490529b368e9

--001a11410d689ec1490529b368e9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi All,

Looks like we have a total of +10, with +6 binding. Thanks to all who voted
and participated in the discussion!

-Jason

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Jun Rao <jun@confluent.io> wrote:

> Thanks for the proposal. +1.
>
> Jun
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Jason Gustafson <jason@confluent.io>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I'd like to open up the vote on KIP-41. This KIP adds a new consumer
> > configuration option "max.poll.records" which sets an upper bound on the
> > number of records returned in a call to poll(). This gives users a way to
> > limit message processing time to avoid unexpected rebalancing. This
> change
> > is backwards compatible with the default implementing the current
> behavior.
> >
> > Here's a link to the KIP wiki:
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-41%3A+KafkaConsumer+Max+Records
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jason
> >
>

--001a11410d689ec1490529b368e9--