kafka-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Stein <crypt...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: git workflow
Date Sat, 05 Jan 2013 04:35:26 GMT
I started following this so far really helpful thanks!!

Running into some issues reviewing someone's patch getting "Patch does not
have a valid e-mail address." googling to figure out what is wrong figure I
mention here if anyone bumped into this yet

thnx

On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Jun Rao <junrao@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for documenting this. Could you also add how to resolve conflicts
> during rebase?
>
> Jun
>
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Jay Kreps <jay.kreps@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I don't know about other people but I find git kind of confusing. I
> thought
> > it would be useful to try to document the normal workflow for different
> use
> > cases:
> > 1. Contributing a patch
> > 2. Reviewing and integrating a patch that is contributed
> > 3. Doing development as a committer
> > 4. Keeping a copy of your local work on github (since it doesn't seem
> > Apache has a place to keep local backups of work in progress).
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Git+Workflow
> >
> > I would like to link this up from the contributor page to help people
> > (including my future self). Objections?
> >
> > I am not a git expert, so any feedback to improve these recipes or bug
> > fixes (since I haven't tried everything) would be very much appreciated.
> If
> > you are about to do one of the above things, try the recipe and see if it
> > can be improved.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > -Jay
> >
>



-- 

/*
Joe Stein
http://www.linkedin.com/in/charmalloc
Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop>
*/

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message