jclouds-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Gaul <g...@apache.org>
Subject Re: AWS v4 Signature algorithm required for generic-S3
Date Sat, 12 Dec 2020 03:04:12 GMT
1) and 2) are hacky but will work.  However we should really properly
support this by giving the generic S3 provider a property.  This would
require reparenting some code from aws-s3 to s3.  Would you be able to
submit a PR for this?

The unsigned payload is also a desired feature and easy to add after
fixing the above.

We plan to release 2.3.0 later this month so it could include these
features if you can help out!

On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 07:42:22PM -0000, John Calcote wrote:
> I see someone asked this very question a while back (2018): https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/3553946dcbe7c72fc8f82c6353c9a5c56d7b587da18a4ebe12df1e26%40%3Cuser.jclouds.apache.org%3E
> 
> Did anyone ever solve the double read issue regarding disabling data-hashing?
> 
> On 2020/12/10 18:03:13, John Calcote <john.calcote@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > Hi all - 
> > 
> > We have a client who would like to use jclouds with ONTAP 9.8, which requires V4
signatures AND path-based URL naming. I believe the true AWS S3 provider requires virtual
bucket URL naming. Anyone have any ideas on how to either:
> > 
> > 1) coerce jclouds into using the AWS S3 provider with path-based naming or
> > 2) coerce jclouds into using the generic S3 provider with V4 signing
> > 
> > Thanks in advance.
> > John
> > 

-- 
Andrew Gaul
http://gaul.org/

Mime
View raw message