Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C600200CA3 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 10:43:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 1AD79160BC4; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 08:43:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D7E9160BB5 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 10:43:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 82072 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2017 08:43:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact oak-issues-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 82061 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2017 08:43:06 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Jun 2017 08:43:06 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 27922182170 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 08:43:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -100.002 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.002 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xTHAA8eg3tBu for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 08:43:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 483765F299 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 08:43:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C4E91E05F7 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 08:43:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 8364A21B57 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 08:43:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 08:43:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alex Parvulescu (JIRA)" To: oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (OAK-4410) More aggressive cleanup for offline compaction MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 08:43:08 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex Parvulescu resolved OAK-4410. ---------------------------------- Resolution: Won't Fix don't plan to work on this, if there's interest, the patch is attached to this issue. > More aggressive cleanup for offline compaction > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: OAK-4410 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4410 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: segmentmk > Reporter: Alex Parvulescu > Assignee: Alex Parvulescu > Attachments: OAK-4410.patch, OAK-4410-v2.patch > > > In the case where a segment store doesn't use an external datastore, running offline compaction can result in a slight increase of the overall size, due to the cleanup threshold check present in the TarReader. > I think we need to be more aggressive with GC for offline compaction (basically reduce the threshold to zero), this would give more predictable results in terms of size. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)