Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F12FD76F1 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 08:23:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75923 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2011 08:23:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 75887 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2011 08:23:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 75861 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2011 08:23:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 08:23:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mueller@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.189 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.189] (HELO exprod6og105.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 08:23:11 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com ([192.150.11.134]) by exprod6ob105.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 01:22:51 PDT Received: from inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (inner-relay-4.adobe.com [193.104.215.14]) by outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id p9C8LFou017263 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 01:21:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nacas02.corp.adobe.com (nacas02.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.100]) by inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id p9C8MlLV011685 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 01:22:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eurhub01.eur.adobe.com (10.128.4.30) by nacas02.corp.adobe.com (10.8.189.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.192.1; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 01:22:46 -0700 Received: from eurmbx01.eur.adobe.com ([10.128.4.32]) by eurhub01.eur.adobe.com ([10.128.4.30]) with mapi; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:22:45 +0100 From: Thomas Mueller To: "dev@jackrabbit.apache.org" Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:22:41 +0100 Subject: Re: About FileDataStore mod-time update Thread-Topic: About FileDataStore mod-time update Thread-Index: AcyIuB3DN72Wut50T++Vif2+6Fmlqg== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.13.0.110805 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CABB19911CCC6muelleradobecom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_CABB19911CCC6muelleradobecom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, > This means that every time a file is accessed is like has been modified a= nd this is not true. When garbage collection is running, yes. > incremental backups does not make sense If incremental backup only checks the last modified time, then it's a probl= em, I agree. However I'm afraid I don't know a better way to solve the prob= lem (mark the file as still being used). Suggestions are always welcome of = course. Is it possible that the incremental backup checks the file creation time in= stead of the last modification time? Regards, Thomas --_000_CABB19911CCC6muelleradobecom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

=
> This means that every time a file is accessed is like has been mo= dified and this is not true. 

When garbage co= llection is running, yes.

<= /div>
> incremental backups does not make sense
If incremental backup only checks the last modified time, then= it's a problem, I agree. However I'm afraid I don't know a better way to s= olve the problem (mark the file as still being used). Suggestions are alway= s welcome of course.

Is it possible that the incre= mental backup checks the file creation time instead of the last modificatio= n time?

Regards,
Thomas

--_000_CABB19911CCC6muelleradobecom_--