Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-stanbol-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-stanbol-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD6DA326A for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 13:53:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71291 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 13:53:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-stanbol-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 71233 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 13:53:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact stanbol-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: stanbol-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list stanbol-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for stanbol-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 68195 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 13:50:37 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Message-ID: <4DC15990.3090503@istc.cnr.it> Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 15:50:08 +0200 From: Alessandro Adamou User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stanbol-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: SLF4J bindings Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi, I started to get SLF4J-related errors when running Kres unit tests these days. Stuff like --- SLF4J: slf4j-api 1.6.x (or later) is incompatible with this binding. SLF4J: Your binding is version 1.5.5 or earlier. SLF4J: Upgrade your binding to version 1.6.x. or 2.0.x --- Tests won't run at all. Some failures occur when testing via Eclipse, others with Maven. A mvn dependency:tree on the Stanbol root says that most Stanbol components are using 1.6.1 where I'm sitting today, as their POMs don't seem to specify a version. We had forced version 1.5.2 for Kres bundles, both with slf4j-api and its bindings. Could it be time to stop depending on it? And what binding is best to adopt between slf4j-simple and slf4j-log4j12 ? I don't think we have to stick to a specific version or binding, so long as the API stays compatible. Cheers Alessandro -- M.Sc. Alessandro Adamou Alma Mater Studiorum - Universit� di Bologna Department of Computer Science Mura Anteo Zamboni 7, Bologna - Italy Semantic Technology Laboratory (STLab) Institute for Cognitive Science and Technology (ISTC) National Research Council (CNR) Via Nomentana 56, 00161 Rome - Italy "As for the charges against me, I am unconcerned. I am beyond their timid, lying morality, and so I am beyond caring." (Col. Walter E. Kurtz)