From photark-dev-return-1243-apmail-incubator-photark-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Sun Feb 06 04:51:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-photark-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58825 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2011 04:51:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Feb 2011 04:51:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 32238 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2011 04:51:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-photark-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 32201 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2011 04:51:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact photark-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: photark-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list photark-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 32193 invoked by uid 99); 6 Feb 2011 04:51:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 04:51:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of umashanthip@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.47] (HELO mail-yi0-f47.google.com) (209.85.218.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 04:51:12 +0000 Received: by yie16 with SMTP id 16so1417064yie.6 for ; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 20:50:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=vd/0SWRQh8TbB2VKRI5sU4K9gul26en6gNyPkUyZ64U=; b=QE43sgPyXF0XiL186aIRaQd7US2vPaa6cqUtKSNGOgW5eNdkso/MgVvr3W83oKvb1f 7nWE5padjQcYV+maZsuElv8FwK2H0/RSNQJGSGM2Bi51Tv4l9lKQb2VWBATgWIc/XEXh jNxfRbNsPkB5mprqwvZMnikI+XKVMZ68FHAT0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=UnEyD18Sl8FK6ZUsx7dfU1u7YCCrtme5KqTBIy+AvZpaRyusPLYMHdlOe9B5cErduT 5DGIbM4nqipn9u48Tg2AlTS6ZT+CyNssqx9GwLP32OiuWM0He/7pCOCKA+01sLZStQkX MF05eGOjIiCzfQrUhkw3SvQNJF+cV17KtdsdU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.237.12 with SMTP id k12mr8575217anh.220.1296967851202; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 20:50:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.94.4 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 20:50:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 10:20:51 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Making PhotArk More Social From: Umashanthi Pavalanathan To: photark-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016368e1ee90e58f8049b95dc98 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016368e1ee90e58f8049b95dc98 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Umashanthi Pavalanathan > > > > > What is the back-end storage mechanism expected for the future releases? > Is > > it the JCR mechanism? > > I can have a look at it and come up with the storage structure of > activities > > etc. > > > > As for the storage system, we currently use a JCR repository, but I > believe this is something we can discuss. If you think that a > different storage mechanism would work better with the relationships > and other requirements from open social, please start a new thread and > let's discuss this with the community. Personally, I've been working > with some noSQL databases, and think they can be another option for > us. > Sure. I'm not much familiar with the JCR repository. I'll first look into it and then will post my opinions. Thanks, ~Umashanthi > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > --0016368e1ee90e58f8049b95dc98--