incubator-photark-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Luciano Resende <>
Subject Re: GalleryTestCase failing
Date Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:15:53 GMT
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 7:30 AM, avdhesh .java <> wrote:
> i have tried build the photark...but the GallerTestCase failed..
> i have investigated the reason and found that when i change Assert condition
> from
> Assert.assertEquals("album-1", albums[0].getName());
> Assert.assertEquals("album-2", albums[1].getName());
> to
> Assert.assertEquals("album-2", albums[0].getName());
> Assert.assertEquals("album-1", albums[1].getName());
> it worked and GalleryTestCase run successfully....
Thanks, as you mentioned below, this is probably because the way the
albums are read from my unix based fileSystem are coming in a
different order compared to the os you are using. How about a slightly
different fix, that should make this work independent of the os.


> Actually gallery implementation needs to improved so that it reads albums
> alphabetic  order....

Should we read in alphabetic order ? Or should we read based on when
the album was created, and make the most recent ones in the top ?
I'm trying to finish up working on album upload, and once that part is
done, I believe we are going to have more information about the
albums, which would make this much easier, but for now I guess we
could try to check the directory creation date... but that might be
misleading if for example you just created the folder by checking out
the project source...

> --
> Thanks,
> Avdhesh
> 09873421630
> Disclaimer: Any resemblance between the above views and those of my
> employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely coincidental.
> Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic. The
> question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is
> left as an exercise for the reader. The question of the existence of the
> reader is left as an exercise for the second god coefficient. (A discussion
> of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond the scope of this
> article.)

Luciano Resende

View raw message