Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gianugo@gmail.com designates
 72.14.220.154 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=Jk72ER1lzMdGMEuQ96izVCuaPWYFr9XHkzt1PV6qOB9vqb/rNRuC6V6wppivn92jh3
         LUZvc5jgZEqC47WaHU34kNDd3uIP8BcVfEQX3hbqeSO8nlIaIDlufsIZFUPxtqZvFblO
         KAFRuRdw3z9Q6i5uxJ074r8hCNqxyqch6QwzQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f767f0600912090933w494ef7b9y81c96455d92b5b5b@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <2CDD44F49E3D47459EB0282354AE42AE22ADC47842@DEWDFECCR05.wdf.sap.corp>
	 <f767f0600912090933w494ef7b9y81c96455d92b5b5b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 18:45:01 +0100
Message-ID: <7557e99f0912090945o49a764f9yb1c3f5010a956bc@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenCMIS incubator for Content Mangement
	Interoperability Services (CMIS)
From: Gianugo Rabellino <gianugo@gmail.com>
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<bdelacretaz@apache.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Goetz, Paul <paul.goetz@sap.com> wrote:
>
>> ...Alignment
>> Apache Chemistry aims to build a CMIS implementation, too. The focus for OpenCMIS is to provide a
>> self-contained client library for CMIS for Java only - while Chemistry is aiming at a broader scope, as
>> it started from a JCR/Jackrabbit based approach and is planning to support Javascript as well.
>> As the APIs are pretty different right now, contributing the OpenCMIS code to Chemistry will
>> be very hard to do - but on a mid-term perspective, we will review our options to merge
>> OpenCMIS with Chemistry....
>
> I'm not sure if having two podlings implementing CMIS is a good idea.

I second that. Although I am, in principle, interested, I'd like to
know more about what would differentiate OpenCMIS from Chemistry, and
why is this duplication a good thing. From your proposal, I seem to
understand you are more focused on the CMIS client side, yet I would
like to understand a bit more what's missing from the client Chemistry
bit.

-- 
Gianugo

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org