ignite-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alexey Kuznetsov <akuznet...@gridgain.com>
Subject Re: Ignite Schema Import Utility - Case mismatch between table index and query index defined in generated code
Date Fri, 01 Apr 2016 15:09:13 GMT
Jan,

It seems a bug in code generator, I will take a look and fix next week.

Thanks for pointing this out.

I will update this thread when I fix this issue.

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 7:32 PM, jan.swaelens <jan.swaelens@sofico.be> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Continuing my initial mention of this problem in another  thread
> <
> http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Ignite-Schema-Import-Utility-Mismatch-when-loading-data-between-Date-and-Timestamp-tp3790p3806.html
> >
> where more information such as DDL and generated code can be found:
>
> Looking in the CacheConfig java file you see query indexes being defined
> which reference uppercase column names, this indeed matches with the table
> definition. However the pojo and defined fields are not completely in
> uppercase, which causes a failure when the H2 tables are being created
> during the definition of the cache.
>
> Would this be something than be fixed in the code generator, to use the
> field name generated in java rather than the direct index name obtained
> from
> the DDL when generating query index definition code?
>
> br
> jan
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Ignite-Schema-Import-Utility-Case-mismatch-between-table-index-and-query-index-defined-in-generated-e-tp3858.html
> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>



-- 
Alexey Kuznetsov
GridGain Systems
www.gridgain.com

Mime
View raw message