Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ibatis-user-cs-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 93494 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2006 18:02:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Sep 2006 18:02:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 25538 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2006 18:02:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ibatis-user-cs-archive@ibatis.apache.org Received: (qmail 25348 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2006 18:02:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-cs-help@ibatis.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user-cs@ibatis.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user-cs@ibatis.apache.org Received: (qmail 25337 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2006 18:02:31 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.87.54.7] (HELO outbound-smtp.firstam.com) (69.87.54.7) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:02:30 -0700 Received: from 10.48.129.31 by outbound-smtp.firstam.com with ESMTP ( Hello SMTP Relay); Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:01:43 -0700 X-Server-Uuid: 4892E436-2134-4AF3-ACFD-57F92EC383DC Received: from interactive-out.firstam.com (HELO FAIDHTC01SXCH01.fafiddom.com) ([10.176.18.103]) by FAEMSNA01SMXS02.FIRSTAM.COM with ESMTP; 15 Sep 2006 11:01:42 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Cache for procedure Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:02:03 -0700 Message-ID: <751F0B5E81B1D3428FA924F462497A2502EB1ED2@FAIDHTC01SXCH01.fafiddom.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Cache for procedure thread-index: AcbY8C81ZlBnQgpXQvmtJNH7LwbK8A== From: "Choi, Brian" To: user-cs@ibatis.apache.org X-TMWD-Spam-Summary: SEV=1.1; DFV=A2006091506; IFV=2.0.6,4.0-7; RPD=4.00.0004; RPDID=303030312E30413031303230322E34353041453843322E303030443A5343464D413534333432342D462D2F4E4553574B563534472F71554B6D71577A564237673D3D; ENG=IBF; TS=20060915180143; CAT=NONE; CON=NONE; X-WSS-ID: 6914350D4B81747241-01-01 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C6D8F1.0CB7784A" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C6D8F1.0CB7784A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Is caching working for stored proc call.=20 I applied same cache model to "select" and "procedure" statements. Somehow caching is working only for "select" statement. If this is known problem do we already have patch for this? =20 Brian Choi ------_=_NextPart_001_01C6D8F1.0CB7784A Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Is caching working for stored proc call. =

I applied same cache model to “select” = and “procedure” statements.

Somehow caching is working only for = “select” statement.

If this is known problem do we already have patch = for this?

 

Brian Choi

------_=_NextPart_001_01C6D8F1.0CB7784A--