hudi-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sivabalan <n.siv...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release 0.9.0, release candidate #2
Date Mon, 23 Aug 2021 22:23:00 GMT
+1 (binding)

1. Release validation succeeded
2. Ran quick start for two variants (spark2, scala11 and spark3, scala12)
for all operations.
3. Ran docker demo and verified all 3 query engines (spark sql, hive,
presto) and 3 query types(snapshot, read optimized, incremental) across two
tables.

./release/validate_staged_release.sh --release=0.9.0 --rc_num=2
/tmp/validation_scratch_dir_001
~/Documents/personal/projects/a_hudi/hudi/scripts
local dir local_svn_dir
Downloading from svn co https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist//dev/hudi
Validating hudi-0.9.0-rc2 with release type "dev"
Checking Checksum of Source Release
    Checksum Check of Source Release - [OK]

  % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time
 Current
                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left
 Speed
100 42380  100 42380    0     0   156k      0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:--
 156k
Checking Signature
    Signature Check - [OK]

Checking for binary files in source release
    No Binary Files in Source Release? - [OK]

Checking for DISCLAIMER
    DISCLAIMER file exists ? [OK]

Checking for LICENSE and NOTICE
    License file exists ? [OK]
    Notice file exists ? [OK]

Performing custom Licensing Check
    Licensing Check Passed [OK]

Running RAT Check
    RAT Check Passed [OK]







On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 9:09 PM Vinoth Chandar <vinoth@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> RC check [1] passed
>
> [1] https://gist.github.com/vinothchandar/68b34f3051e41752ebffd6a3edeb042b
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 1:28 PM Sivabalan <n.siva.b@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > We can keep the specific discussion out of this voting thread. Have
> started
> > a new thread here
> > <
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3bae7622904b04c7d1fb2ddaf5226e37166d5fbb1721f403b1b04545%40%3Cdev.hudi.apache.org%3E
> > >
> > to
> > continue this discussion. We can keep this thread just for voting.
> Thanks.
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 2:13 AM Danny Chan <danny0405@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > It's not a surprise that 0.9 has a longer release process, the Spark
> SQL
> > > was added and many promotions from the Flink engine. We need more
> > patience
> > > for this release IMO.
> > >
> > > Having another minor release like 0.9.1 is a solution but not a good
> one,
> > > people have much more promise to the major release and it carries
> > > many expectations. If people report the problems during the release
> > > process, just accept it if it is not a big PR/fix, and there are only a
> > few
> > > ones up to now. I would not take too much time.
> > >
> > > I know that it has been about 4 months since the last release, but
> people
> > > want a complete release version not a defective one.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Danny
> > >
> > > Sivabalan <n.siva.b@gmail.com> 于2021年8月22日周日 上午11:50写道:
> > >
> > > > I would like to share my thoughts on the release process in general.
> I
> > > will
> > > > read more about what exactly qualifies for -1 and will look into what
> > > Peng
> > > > and Danny has put up. But some thoughts on the release in general.
> > > >
> > > > Every release process is very tedious and time consuming and RM does
> > put
> > > in
> > > > non-trivial amount of work in getting the release out. To make the
> > > process
> > > > smooth, RM started an email thread by Aug 3, calling for any release
> > > > blockers. Would like to understand, if these were surfaced in that
> > > thread?
> > > > What I am afraid of is, we might keep delaying our release by adding
> > more
> > > > patches/bug fixes with every candidate. For instance, if we consider
> > > these
> > > > and RM works on RC3 and puts up a vote in 5 days and what if someone
> > else
> > > > wants to add a couple of more fixes or improvements to the release?
> If
> > > it's
> > > > a very serious bug that one cannot do basic operations like
> > insert/upsert
> > > > in any of the engines or some serious regression, yeah we can
> > definitely
> > > > block the release. But if there are corner case bugs, or any
> > improvements
> > > > in general, we can always have another release immediately following
> > > this.
> > > > This is my humble opinion having gone through the release process
> > myself
> > > in
> > > > the past and have helped others in doing the release in Hudi. It's
> been
> > > > more than 4 months we have had a release. Would be good for us to be
> > > > mindful of that as well. Maybe this is common in other projects, but
> I
> > am
> > > > not aware of that. Please enlighten me if you have experience with
> > other
> > > > projects.
> > > >
> > > > I would like to hear from other PMCs and experts who are more
> > > > knowledgeable about the release process.
> > > > And if anyone has any suggestions on improving the release process in
> > > > general (if we can seal the patches that go into a release upfront,
> > > etc), I
> > > > am all ears to that as well.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 10:41 PM Danny Chan <danny0405@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I have fired a cherry-pick PR:
> > > https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/3519
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Danny
> > > > >
> > > > > Danny Chan <danny0405@apache.org> 于2021年8月22日周日
上午9:07写道:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I'm sorry I would also vote -1.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > HUDI-2316
> > > > > > HUDI-2340
> > > > > > HUDI-2342
> > > > > >
> > > > > > are all important improvements for Flink and we hope they can
be
> > > > > > cherry picked to release 0.9.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > Danny
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Udit Mehrotra <uditme@apache.org> 于2021年8月21日周六
上午7:13写道:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Hi everyone,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the
> version
> > > > > 0.9.0,
> > > > > >> as follows:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> > > comments)
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> The complete staging area is available for your review,
which
> > > > includes:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
> > releases
> > > > to
> > > > > be
> > > > > >> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the
key
> > with
> > > > > >> fingerprint 44A484600E48193A74F97447C47E66F8386204DF [3],
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
> > [4],
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> * source code tag "release-0.9.0-rc2" [5],
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted
by
> > > majority
> > > > > >> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Release Manager
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> [1]
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12322822&version=12350027
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hudi/hudi-0.9.0-rc2/
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hudi/KEYS
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> [4]
> > > > > >>
> > > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehudi-1043/
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> <
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehudi-1042/org/apache/hudi/
> > > > > >> >[5]
> > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/hudi/tree/release-0.9.0-rc2
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Regards,
> > > > -Sivabalan
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > -Sivabalan
> >
>


-- 
Regards,
-Sivabalan

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message