Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-modules-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-modules-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 255401036D for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 21:27:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35607 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2013 21:27:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-modules-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 35573 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2013 21:27:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact modules-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: modules-dev@httpd.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list modules-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 35565 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2013 21:27:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 21:27:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of covener@gmail.com designates 209.85.128.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.128.176] (HELO mail-ve0-f176.google.com) (209.85.128.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 21:27:29 +0000 Received: by mail-ve0-f176.google.com with SMTP id c13so6562267vea.7 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 14:27:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=nSRyKC5rz2adt9W/L5jCT4WxSooNXh9qico+uG9TeAw=; b=sguOezTbSkHxt1G2YY/I3hIEGcCvFrBwjpGc+UgBFXSp+B0X7rPEYh72DqEj6+mexB gqygsMGbb915Z5melbgRCDFbxMov2yiSGWcuju5o3cMYEecjot2hwf2KQ6QZ0qNcacQ7 4z1AxQw1F59KAXmzNCn6pxx2eSnAhEcLboHTJ3XaVX7kxTtpfEuzdtiioRYTEUn4spY6 BgqTZXr9+zridpgsLdB3DhOrrEwF5pM/B8yQ0ofZysVRirtIB205aMkrjf1eFzr4oGRR 8O90Km0XbK/o0m/q9e3x8zh/Vyb145ESSFaCbpupZoKWyzX+mncBbR03tiGHRj5yGu7s H5Lg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.165.12 with SMTP id yu12mr2926445vdb.40.1373491628861; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 14:27:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.84.165 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 14:27:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A8AB74F-D003-4F2C-9524-0E756C094D86@alex.org.uk> References: <4A8AB74F-D003-4F2C-9524-0E756C094D86@alex.org.uk> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 17:27:08 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Threaded vs non-threaded dev package From: Eric Covener To: modules-dev@httpd.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Alex Bligh wrote: > I am compiling a module I have written on Ubuntu Precise. The module will always > be run on apache-mpm-prefork (i.e. the non-threaded mpm), but the module itself > uses threads (apr_thread*). Should I be compiling against apache2-threaded-dev > or apache2-prefork-dev? Or doesn't it matter? Should not matter. You probably care about APR_HAS_THREADS which is more of a platform thing and won't change if someone ships different httpd MPMS. -- Eric Covener covener@gmail.com